DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26753] - Persistent store or cache corruption?

2004-02-10 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26753] - Persistent store or cache corruption?

2004-02-10 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26753] - Persistent store or cache corruption?

2004-02-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26753] - Persistent store or cache corruption?

2004-02-09 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Le Lundi, 9 fév 2004, à 11:19 Europe/Zurich, Carsten Ziegeler a écrit : Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: ...But shouldn't we add prominent warnings to such issues, a link on the welcome page or something? Yes, but we have to be very careful with the formulation. Users shouldn't Get the impression that

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26753] - Persistent store or cache corruption?

2004-02-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26753] - Persistent store or cache corruption?

2004-02-09 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Le Dimanche, 8 fév 2004, à 14:11 Europe/Zurich, Joerg Heinicke a écrit : http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/cocoon-2.1/lib/core/Attic/excalibur- store-20031211.jar I've tried with this jar instead of the one which is in CVS now and was able to reproduce the lockup problem, details at http://nago

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26753] - Persistent store or cache corruption?

2004-02-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26753] - Persistent store or cache corruption?

2004-02-09 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > > Le Dimanche, 8 fév 2004, à 18:59 Europe/Zurich, Carsten > Ziegeler a écrit : > > > ...Now, in general I totally agree with you, but I fear > that this bug > > is in there for a long time, which means all 2.1.x releases have > > already this bug (perhaps I'm wron

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26753] - Persistent store or cache corruption?

2004-02-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26753] - Persistent store or cache corruption?

2004-02-09 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Le Dimanche, 8 fév 2004, à 18:59 Europe/Zurich, Carsten Ziegeler a écrit : ...Now, in general I totally agree with you, but I fear that this bug is in there for a long time, which means all 2.1.x releases have already this bug (perhaps I'm wrong)... In this case no problem to release with bug 26

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26753] - Persistent store or cache corruption?

2004-02-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26753] - Persistent store or cache corruption?

2004-02-08 Thread Geoff Howard
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Geoff Howard wrote: I didn't realize this was not a universal problem. The impression I had was that this was consistently repeatable given the same actions in any installation. Oh, ok - this might be, perhaps I'm wrong. I didn't try it, but it looked for me like a pro

RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26753] - Persistent store or cache corruption?

2004-02-08 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Geoff Howard wrote: > > I didn't realize this was not a universal problem. The impression I had > was that this was consistently repeatable given the same actions in any > installation. > Oh, ok - this might be, perhaps I'm wrong. I didn't try it, but it looked for me like a problem we faced s

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26753] - Persistent store or cache corruption?

2004-02-08 Thread Geoff Howard
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: -Original Message- From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2004 9:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26753] - Persistent store or cache corruption? Le Samedi, 7 fév 2004, à

RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26753] - Persistent store or cache corruption?

2004-02-08 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > -Original Message- > From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2004 9:49 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26753] - Persistent store or cache > corruption? > > > Le

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26753] - Persistent store or cache corruption?

2004-02-08 Thread Joerg Heinicke
On 08.02.2004 11:57, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: ...Bertrand, can you do your test again with the former version of the JAR (mid december)? From what I see the bug was already in before and the patch provided by Charles did not solve it as it does not address the bug in JISP, but only the usage

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26753] - Persistent store or cache corruption?

2004-02-08 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Le Dimanche, 8 fév 2004, à 10:23 Europe/Zurich, Joerg Heinicke a écrit : ...Bertrand, can you do your test again with the former version of the JAR (mid december)? From what I see the bug was already in before and the patch provided by Charles did not solve it as it does not address the bug in J

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26753] - Persistent store or cache corruption?

2004-02-08 Thread Antonio Gallardo
Geoff Howard dijo: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26753 >> >> Persistent store or cache corruption? >> >> --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-02-07 18:34 >> --- >> Afaik, this is a known Jisp bug which should be fixed ac

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26753] - Persistent store or cache corruption?

2004-02-08 Thread Joerg Heinicke
On 08.02.2004 09:48, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Afaik, this is a known Jisp bug which should be fixed according to Scott with Jisp 3.0. We could try to switch to Jisp 3.0 after the release and see what happens. Are you saying after the release because Jisp 3.0 would require more changes in th

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26753] - Persistent store or cache corruption?

2004-02-08 Thread Antonio Gallardo
Bertrand Delacretaz dijo: > Le Samedi, 7 fév 2004, à 23:44 Europe/Zurich, Geoff Howard a écrit : > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26753 >>> Persistent store or cache corruption? >>> --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-02-0

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26753] - Persistent store or cache corruption?

2004-02-08 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Le Samedi, 7 fév 2004, à 23:44 Europe/Zurich, Geoff Howard a écrit : [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26753 Persistent store or cache corruption? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-02-07 18:34 --- Afaik, this is a known Jisp

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26753] - Persistent store or cache corruption?

2004-02-07 Thread Geoff Howard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26753 Persistent store or cache corruption? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-02-07 18:34 --- Afaik, this is a known Jisp bug which should be fixed according to Scott with Jisp 3.0. We could

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26753] - Persistent store or cache corruption?

2004-02-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26753] - Persistent store or cache corruption?

2004-02-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26753] - Persistent store or cache corruption?

2004-02-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26753] - Persistent store or cache corruption?

2004-02-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu