Doc about important changes

2004-03-09 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
It seems that we need a place where we can put important changes for 2.1.5. This is currently the renaming of woody to cocoon forms and the incompatible excalibur-logger change that might cause problems with existing installations. Apart from putting it on the Wiki has someone a good idea where

Re: Doc about important changes

2004-03-09 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Le Mardi, 9 mars 2004, à 12:23 Europe/Zurich, Carsten Ziegeler a écrit : ...Apart from putting it on the Wiki has someone a good idea where to place such things so that they are visible for people downloading or extracting the distribution? Perhaps a Readme.1st etc. How about a WARNING.TXT which

Re: Doc about important changes

2004-03-09 Thread Antonio Gallardo
Carsten Ziegeler dijo: It seems that we need a place where we can put important changes for 2.1.5. This is currently the renaming of woody to cocoon forms and the incompatible excalibur-logger change that might cause problems with existing installations. Apart from putting it on the Wiki

Re: Doc about important changes

2004-03-09 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: It seems that we need a place where we can put important changes for 2.1.5. This is currently the renaming of woody to cocoon forms and the incompatible excalibur-logger change that might cause problems with existing installations. Apart from putting it on the Wiki has

[Vote] new importance attribute on in status.xml (was: Re: Doc about important changes)

2004-03-09 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: It seems that we need a place where we can put important changes for 2.1.5. This is currently the renaming of woody to cocoon forms and the incompatible excalibur-logger change that might cause problems with existing installations. Apart from putting it on the Wiki has

Re: [Vote] new importance attribute on in status.xml (was: Re: Doc about important changes)

2004-03-09 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Le Mardi, 9 mars 2004, à 14:14 Europe/Zurich, Sylvain Wallez a écrit : - do you want to add an importance=high|low|medium attribute on action in changes.xml? +1 - do you want each block to have it's own status.xml file? +0.5 (trying to be more precise in votes: I'm for it but cannot help ATM)