RE: Dynamic pipeline assembly, was Re: [RT] the value of beingwrong

2003-07-15 Thread Reinhard Pötz
> -Original Message- > From: Timothy Larson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 6:13 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Dynamic pipeline assembly, was Re: [RT] the value of > beingwrong > > > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/15

Dynamic pipeline assembly, was Re: [RT] the value of beingwrong

2003-07-15 Thread Timothy Larson
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/15/03 11:48AM >>> ... (despite the continous call for pipeline dynamic assembly, which has been continously challenged and never implemented) ... Would you mind writing a concise summary of the arguments against this feature? I keep thinking it would be useful, and tend to