Oops. I forgot to mention that the main layout could handled by the
jxtemplate generator in this case.
-Original Message-
From: Ralph Goers
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 3:02 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: JXTemplate performance
This may sound a tad bit bizarre, bu
TED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag
> von Corin Moss
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 5. Mai 2004 23:42
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: RE: JXTemplate performance
>
>
>
> Hi Sylvain,
>
> Not wanting to start a game of twenty questions here, but your comment
> regarding ca
) the header, nav, and footer are constant but the body (or a
part of it) changes with every request.
Ralph
-Original Message-
From: Sylvain Wallez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 2:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: JXTemplate performance
JXTemplate as
May 2004 9:33 a.m.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: JXTemplate performance
Ralph Goers wrote:
> In looking at JXTemplate it looks like many, if not all, of the things
> we are doing with XSLT could possibly be done with JXTemplate instead.
> Is this correct, or am I missing
Ralph Goers wrote:
In looking at JXTemplate it looks like many, if not all, of the things
we are doing with XSLT could possibly be done with JXTemplate instead.
Is this correct, or am I missing something.
JXTemplate has many of the XSLT control structure, but lacks everything
that is related t
In looking at JXTemplate it looks like many, if not all, of
the things we are doing with XSLT could possibly be done with JXTemplate
instead. Is this correct, or am I missing something.
Secondly, if I can replace XSLT with JXTemplate, is it worth
it? It certainly could be more readable
