Hi,
On 7 Jul 2004, at 17:17, Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
On Jul 7, 2004, at 8:03 AM, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Giaunugo, I committed the unique ID fix (using an instance counter).
Can you please crosscheck?
Thanks so much Sylvain! I'm out of the office for the next two days,
but I'll get back to you
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
snip/
The interpreter is looked up by the sitemap engine (see
FlowNode.java), so in that case SingleThreaded means a different
instance for each sitemap, which handles all requests for that sitemap.
A bit hacky, but that's how it is since the origin
On Jul 7, 2004, at 8:03 AM, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Giaunugo, I committed the unique ID fix (using an instance counter).
Can you please crosscheck?
Thanks so much Sylvain! I'm out of the office for the next two days,
but I'll get back to you ASAP if Andrew/Jerm don't beat me at it...
Ciao,
--
Hi,
On 5 Jul 2004, at 22:16, Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
I changed that to
private String getSitemapPath() throws Exception {
return ObjectModelHelper.getRequest(
EnvironmentHelper.getCurrentEnvironment().getObjectModel()).getSitemapU
RI();
}
but being a freshman on Cocoon flow
On 6 Jul 2004, at 10:04, Andrew Savory wrote:
Hi,
On 5 Jul 2004, at 22:16, Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
I changed that to
private String getSitemapPath() throws Exception {
return ObjectModelHelper.getRequest(
EnvironmentHelper.getCurrentEnvironment().getObjectModel()).getSitemap
Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
We had an interesting night here, dealing with a really nasty
flowscript issue
(http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=10879848851r=1w=2). Thanks to
the precious help of Jerm, Andrew and Paul Russell, our small
hackaton seemed to be successful in at least nailing the
On Jul 6, 2004, at 11:35 AM, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
I changed that to
private String getSitemapPath() throws Exception {
return ObjectModelHelper.getRequest(
EnvironmentHelper.getCurrentEnvironment().getObjectModel()).getSitemap
UR I();
}
Aargh! You should absolutely
Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
On Jul 6, 2004, at 11:35 AM, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
I changed that to
private String getSitemapPath() throws Exception {
return ObjectModelHelper.getRequest(
EnvironmentHelper.getCurrentEnvironment().getObjectModel()).getSitemap
UR I();
}
Aargh!
Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
On Jul 6, 2004, at 11:35 AM, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
I changed that to
private String getSitemapPath() throws Exception {
return ObjectModelHelper.getRequest(
EnvironmentHelper.getCurrentEnvironment().getObjectModel()).getSitemap
UR I();
}
Aargh!
On Jul 6, 2004, at 12:26 PM, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
There is a solution, though: there's a different FlowIntepreter for
each Processor instance (they are SingleThreaded), and so each
interpreter instance could produce a unique identifier and use it as
the result of getSitemapPath (which
Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
On Jul 6, 2004, at 12:26 PM, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
There is a solution, though: there's a different FlowIntepreter
for each Processor instance (they are SingleThreaded), and so
each interpreter instance could produce a unique identifier and
use it as the result of
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
On Jul 6, 2004, at 12:26 PM, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
There is a solution, though: there's a different FlowIntepreter
for each Processor instance (they are SingleThreaded), and so
each interpreter instance could produce a unique identifier and
use
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
On Jul 6, 2004, at 12:26 PM, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
There is a solution, though: there's a different FlowIntepreter
for each Processor instance (they are SingleThreaded), and so
each interpreter instance could produce a
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
JavaScriptInterpreter should have an id attribute intialized once,
whose value is used instead of getSitemapPath(), e.g.
private String interpreterID = IDGenerator.getNewID();
System.identityHashCode(this) is much simpler than
We had an interesting night here, dealing with a really nasty
flowscript issue
(http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=10879848851r=1w=2). Thanks to
the precious help of Jerm, Andrew and Paul Russell, our small hackaton
seemed to be successful in at least nailing the issue.
So, there you go:
15 matches
Mail list logo
