Giacomo Pati wrote:
On Sat, 19 Nov 2005, Ralph Goers wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
It would be great if more than the two of us would be interested in the
portal stuff. But I think we are very near to a cleanup version which
I'll start to document around christmas (hopefully) and then other
Ralph Goers wrote:
> You make some good points here and the behavior is certainly correct. It
> seemed to me that the search layout was called for each layout as it was
> being processed, but I could be wrong. The solution I added in 2.1 was
> to essentially have the AspectRenderer and RendererC
Giacomo Pati wrote:
>>>Yeah, it would. I'm not sure why this is the case. I find the portal to be
>>>a
>>>great way to build any website, whether it needs the features of a portal or
>>>not.
>
>
> I think it's probably because of a steep learing curve without the
> necessary documentation.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 19 Nov 2005, Ralph Goers wrote:
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 10:40:14 -0800
From: Ralph Goers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: Portal work
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
It would be gr
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
It would be great if more than the two of us would be interested in the
portal stuff. But I think we are very near to a cleanup version which
I'll start to document around christmas (hopefully) and then others will
hopefully join in.
Yeah, it would. I'm not sure why
Ralph Goers wrote:
> Carsten,
>
> I have looked at some of the work you have been doing (and it has been a
> lot). I haven't had a chance to review the latest deployment stuff but I
> do have some items for discussion.
>
It would be great if more than the two of us would be interested in the
po
Carsten,
I have looked at some of the work you have been doing (and it has been a
lot). I haven't had a chance to review the latest deployment stuff but I
do have some items for discussion.
1. I have looked at some of the changes for the minimize/fullscreen
handling. I'm OK with a lot of it
