Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 12:10 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: FYI: New Sitemap Treeprocessor for 2.2
>
> Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>
> >Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> >
> >
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>to avoid double efforts in
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
>
> Ah yeah. But we still need ServiceSelector.
>
Sure, by Container independent I mean "avalon compatible container
independent". Of course, we rely on all the apis provided by
the avalon framework - but nothing more.
>
> Ah, so please commit your PC in the CVS :-)
>
O
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Hi,
to avoid double efforts in the same area, I just wanted to inform you that I will try to write a new tree processor for 2.2 in the next few days.
Why? There are several reasons:
- Reverting to ECM in 2.2 requires some changes to the tre
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >to avoid double efforts in the same area, I just wanted to
> inform you that I will try to write a new tree processor for
> 2.2 in the next few days.
> >
> >Why? There are several reasons:
> >- Reverting to ECM in 2.2 requires some changes to the tree
> pr
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Hi,
to avoid double efforts in the same area, I just wanted to inform you that I will try to write a new tree processor for 2.2 in the next few days.
Why? There are several reasons:
- Reverting to ECM in 2.2 requires some changes to the tree processor used in 2.1.x anyway
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Hi,
to avoid double efforts in the same area, I just wanted to
inform you that I will try to write a new tree processor
for 2.2 in the next few days.
Why? There are several reasons:
- Reverting to ECM in 2.2 requires some changes to the
tree processor used in 2.1.x anyway
