Geoff Howard wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Geoff Howard wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Unico Hommes wrote:
BTW, Unico, I don't know what is your mail software, but it
doesn't send the "In-Reply-To" header, which breaks thread views
in Mozilla and makes following discussions highly difficult.
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Actually, Unico is not the only one. What I've found is that Mozilla
uses the In-Reply-To header whereas Outlook (at least some version) uses
"Thread-Topic" and "Thread-Index".
Outlook's headers seem strange to me, as I don't know how a mailer can
rebuild a thread tree wit
n-Reply-to"
JD
-Original Message-
From: Unico Hommes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2004-01-30 10:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Mail thread headers (was Re: source resolving in 2.2)
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
>
> Geoff Howard wrote:
>
> > Sylvain Wallez
JD Daniels wrote:
>
> Outlook 2000 *does*
>
> I was getting frustrated I was not getting any replies to a
> post i made... I was lazy and just hit reply to an existing
> message to get the address and wiped out the original text.
> This thread made me look.. and it does send "in-Reply-to"
>
-
From: Unico Hommes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2004-01-30 10:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Mail thread headers (was Re: source resolving in 2.2)
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
>
> Geoff Howard wrote:
>
> > Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> >
> >> Unico Hommes wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
>
> Geoff Howard wrote:
>
> > Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> >
> >> Unico Hommes wrote:
> >
>
>
> BTW, Unico, I don't know what is your mail software, but
> it doesn't
> send the "In-Reply-To" header, which breaks thread views
> in Mozilla
> and makes follow
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Geoff Howard wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Unico Hommes wrote:
BTW, Unico, I don't know what is your mail software, but it doesn't
send the "In-Reply-To" header, which breaks thread views in Mozilla
and makes following discussions highly difficult.
I use Outlook. I ch
