RE: No 2.1.2 for download, is that by design?

2004-02-13 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
+1 Carsten > -Original Message- > From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 8:42 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: No 2.1.2 for download, is that by design? > > Le Vendredi, 13 fév 2004, à 08:29 Europe/Zurich,

Re: No 2.1.2 for download, is that by design?

2004-02-12 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Le Vendredi, 13 fév 2004, à 08:29 Europe/Zurich, Carsten Ziegeler a écrit : ...I think the general rule for dists is that only the last release is in the usual dist directory and all other old releases are on archive.apache.org We currently always have three releases there, the last two ones for

RE: No 2.1.2 for download, is that by design?

2004-02-12 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Joerg Heinicke wrote: > On 12.02.2004 17:37, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > > > Did I miss something, or is there a good reason why 2.1.2 is not > > available for download anymore on our mirrors? > > http://archive.apache.org/dist/cocoon/ > I think the general rule for dists is that only the las

Re: No 2.1.2 for download, is that by design?

2004-02-12 Thread Christopher Oliver
IIRC, 2.1.2 contains a Rhino regression (I introduced) that breaks flow completely. Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Did I miss something, or is there a good reason why 2.1.2 is not available for download anymore on our mirrors? -Bertrand Saw this on lenya-dev: De: "Gregor J. Rothfuss" <[EMAIL PRO

Re: No 2.1.2 for download, is that by design?

2004-02-12 Thread Joerg Heinicke
On 12.02.2004 17:37, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Did I miss something, or is there a good reason why 2.1.2 is not available for download anymore on our mirrors? http://archive.apache.org/dist/cocoon/ Joerg Saw this on lenya-dev: De: "Gregor J. Rothfuss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Jeu 12 fév 2004