Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Well, at a very least everything is under the ASL and in sync now...
wouldn't Gump be able to spot the problem if we miss a cycle?
BTW, I think it's a very bad idea to capsulate so many projects in their
jar. The current jar includes BCEL, CUP and
Vadim Gritsenko dijo:
> Tim Larson wrote:
>
>>On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 02:25:24PM -0600, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
>>
>>
>>>While seeing inside the jars I also saw some parts that are interesting
>>>for us (now with the Cocoon hat on). For example all the DOM management.
>>> I
>>>saw the DOMHelpers cl
Tim Larson wrote:
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 02:25:24PM -0600, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
While seeing inside the jars I also saw some parts that are interesting
for us (now with the Cocoon hat on). For example all the DOM management. I
saw the DOMHelpers classes everywhere doing the same over and ov
The bug number is 28032. I added this list as the CC.
Ralph
-Original Message-
From: Joerg Heinicke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 12:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: extra bcel jar
On 29.03.2004 22:38, Ralph Goers wrote:
> Sure.
If you are doing
On 29.03.2004 22:38, Ralph Goers wrote:
Sure.
If you are doing it, can you please post the bug number or add
[EMAIL PROTECTED] as CC?
Thanks,
Joerg
Sure.
Ralph
-Original Message-
From: Antonio Gallardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 12:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: extra bcel jar
Ralph Goers dijo:
> I would suggest that someone open a bugzilla report with them and get them
> to create a v
Ralph Goers dijo:
> I would suggest that someone open a bugzilla report with them and get them
> to create a version without the dependent jars.
Good idea. Can you do that?
Best Regards,
Antonio Gallardo
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 02:25:24PM -0600, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
> While seeing inside the jars I also saw some parts that are interesting
> for us (now with the Cocoon hat on). For example all the DOM management. I
> saw the DOMHelpers classes everywhere doing the same over and over. I
> think in
Gianugo Rabellino dijo:
> Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Well, at a very least everything is under the ASL and in sync now...
wouldn't Gump be able to spot the problem if we miss a cycle?
>>>
>>>BTW, I think it's a very bad idea to capsulate so many projects in their
>>>jar. The current jar includ
rt with them and get them
to create a version without the dependent jars.
Ralph
-Original Message-
From: Gianugo Rabellino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 11:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: extra bcel jar
Joerg Heinicke wrote:
> On 29.03.2004 19:47,
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Well, at a very least everything is under the ASL and in sync now...
wouldn't Gump be able to spot the problem if we miss a cycle?
BTW, I think it's a very bad idea to capsulate so many projects in their
jar. The current jar includes BCEL, CUP and jakarta-regex. Note that we
Stephan Michels dijo:
> Am Mo, den 29.03.2004 schrieb Gianugo Rabellino um 21:46:
>> Joerg Heinicke wrote:
>>
>> > On 29.03.2004 19:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> >
>> >> Remove the bcel classes from the xalan.jar and
>> >> create an extra jar for those.
>> >
>> >
>> > *Ouch*. If I understand
Am Mo, den 29.03.2004 schrieb Gianugo Rabellino um 21:46:
> Joerg Heinicke wrote:
>
> > On 29.03.2004 19:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >> Remove the bcel classes from the xalan.jar and
> >> create an extra jar for those.
> >
> >
> > *Ouch*. If I understand this correctly we have to do
Joerg Heinicke wrote:
On 29.03.2004 19:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Remove the bcel classes from the xalan.jar and
create an extra jar for those.
*Ouch*. If I understand this correctly we have to do it for every update
on the Xalan jar until our continuations stuff goes into bcel that goes
14 matches
Mail list logo
