Bruno Dumon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> On Tue, 2004-06-01 at 23:07, Hunsberger, Peter wrote:
> > Bruno Dumon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > As I've noted previously, we've got a proprietary forms
> system and I
> > don't have much experience with cForms. However, our
> experience m
On Tue, 2004-06-01 at 23:07, Hunsberger, Peter wrote:
> Bruno Dumon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> As I've noted previously, we've got a proprietary forms system and I
> don't have much experience with cForms. However, our experience may be
> useful to you (feel free to disregard!).
Always appr
Bruno Dumon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
As I've noted previously, we've got a proprietary forms system and I
don't have much experience with cForms. However, our experience may be
useful to you (feel free to disregard!).
We allow multiple templates per form model. Basically we treat them both
as
On Sun, 2004-05-30 at 15:01, BURGHARD Eric wrote:
> thanks a lot for your enlightments.
>
> > * the form can't know which widgets the template would decide to
> > display [and thus which widgets are the 'submitted widgets'], unless we
> > would encode that information in the request (ie. by addin
thanks a lot for your enlightments.
> * the form can't know which widgets the template would decide to
> display [and thus which widgets are the 'submitted widgets'], unless we
> would encode that information in the request (ie. by adding a hidden
> input field for each widget to indicate if it i
On Sat, 2004-05-29 at 13:20, BURGHARD Eric wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got a simple question (request) about how the form are validated.
>
> It seems that for the moment, the whole model is validated even if we don't
> use all the widgets in the template.
What you're doing here isn't supported, and yo
