Le Mardi, 9 mars 2004, à 14:14 Europe/Zurich, Sylvain Wallez a écrit :
- do you want to add an importance="high|low|medium" attribute on
in changes.xml?
+1
- do you want each block to have it's own status.xml file?
+0.5
(trying to be more precise in votes: I'm for it but cannot help ATM)
-Bertr
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
It seems that we need a place where we can put "important changes" for 2.1.5.
This is currently the renaming of woody to cocoon forms and the incompatible excalibur-logger change that might cause problems with existing installations.
Apart from putting it on the Wiki has
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
It seems that we need a place where we can put "important changes"
for 2.1.5.
This is currently the renaming of woody to cocoon forms and the
incompatible excalibur-logger change that might cause problems
with existing installations.
Apart from putting it on the Wiki has so
Carsten Ziegeler dijo:
> It seems that we need a place where we can put "important changes"
> for 2.1.5.
>
> This is currently the renaming of woody to cocoon forms and the
> incompatible excalibur-logger change that might cause problems
> with existing installations.
>
> Apart from putting it on t
Le Mardi, 9 mars 2004, à 12:23 Europe/Zurich, Carsten Ziegeler a écrit :
...Apart from putting it on the Wiki has someone a good idea where to
place such things so that they are visible for people downloading
or extracting the distribution? Perhaps a "Readme.1st" etc.
How about a WARNING.TXT which
