Tony Collen wrote:
Christian Haul wrote:
I'm fine with any solution that tries to maintain current behaviour as
much as possible. Indeed, there
is a necessity to access the undecoded parameters or at least easily
access re-encoded parameters.
Mind you, though, that you might need to encode the
Christian Haul wrote:
I'm fine with any solution that tries to maintain current behaviour as
much as possible. Indeed, there
is a necessity to access the undecoded parameters or at least easily
access re-encoded parameters.
Mind you, though, that you might need to encode the parameter name as
Geoff Howard wrote:
Christian Haul wrote:
Tony Collen wrote:
Kai Benndorf wrote:
Hi Tony,
if there really is no way to get the encoded request parameter,
although it's not very smart, we still have the possibility to
encode the parameter anew. Is there already an existing function
to encod
Christian Haul wrote:
Tony Collen wrote:
Kai Benndorf wrote:
Hi Tony,
if there really is no way to get the encoded request parameter,
although it's not very smart, we still have the possibility to encode
the parameter anew. Is there already an existing function to encode
the parameter somew
Tony Collen wrote:
Kai Benndorf wrote:
Hi Tony,
if there really is no way to get the encoded request parameter,
although it's not very smart, we still have the possibility to encode
the parameter anew. Is there already an existing function to encode
the parameter somewhere?
Regards
Kai
W
Kai Benndorf wrote:
Hi Tony,
if there really is no way to get the encoded request parameter, although
it's not very smart, we still have the possibility to encode the
parameter anew. Is there already an existing function to encode the
parameter somewhere?
Regards
Kai
Well, if we can't solve
Hi Tony,
if there really is no way to get the encoded request parameter, although
it's not very smart, we still have the possibility to encode the
parameter anew. Is there already an existing function to encode the
parameter somewhere?
Regards
Kai
Tony Collen schrieb:
(I am bringing this t
Joerg Heinicke wrote:
Hello Tony,
please read the mail at
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=106796038708692&w=2. It
seems to be exactly the same problem. Can you confirm this?
I'm not too sure. It's a similar problem (things being decoded when they shouldn't), but I get the
follo
Hello Tony,
please read the mail at
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=106796038708692&w=2. It
seems to be exactly the same problem. Can you confirm this?
Joerg
On 01.12.2003 19:25, Tony Collen wrote:
(I am bringing this thread over to -dev to ask the experts for help)
Kai Benn
(I am bringing this thread over to -dev to ask the experts for help)
Kai Benndorf wrote:
Hi Tony,
i've opened the following bug:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25102
Best Regards
Kai
Alright, due to my limited knowledge of Avalon, and my brain being in a general state of ru
10 matches
Mail list logo
