On 2 Aug 2004, at 15:26, Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
b) clean up the directory for the new kernel proposal
I think the new kernel should only contain the kernel
but not the whole cocoon stuff; it's outdated anyway.
Most of the stuff we have added to our cocoon-2.2 CVS
repo is now in the coco
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
I think the next steps should be:
a) merge things back from 2.2 to the 2.1.x branch
Yup.
We should backport all bug fixes, especially the fix
for the sitemap reloading problem.
What do you think about tracing the status of the
merge (which block has already, whi
ocoon/trunk (apart from the Fortress
migration).
Carsten
> -Original Message-
> From: Vadim Gritsenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 5:27 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Status of SVN Conversion!!!
>
> Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>
&
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Ok, it seems that it works (=compiles), but I think it's not ready to go.
Sorry, guys - forgot to post status :-)
Cocoon 2.2-dev is here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cocoon/trunk/
Cocoon 2.1.6-dev is here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_
Ok, it seems that it works (=compiles), but I think it's not ready to go.
The svn:ignore properties are missing!
Carsten
> -Original Message-
> From: David Crossley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 8:47 AM
> To: Cocoon-Dev
> Subjec
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Just curious: what's the status of the SVN conversion?
That is something that we are all wondering.
I just presumed that is was ready to go and got it like this:
svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cocoon/trunk cocoon
--
David Crossley
Just curious: what's the status of the SVN conversion?
Carsten
Carsten Ziegeler
Open Source Group, S&N AG
http://www.s-und-n.de
http://www.osoco.net/weblogs/rael/
