FWIW, I found a regexp benchmark at
http://tusker.org/regex/regex_benchmark.html
The times I got on my laptop were
org.apache.regexp.* 14078
java.util.regex.Pattern656
jregex.Pattern 1000
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 14 Jan 2006, Ralph Goers wrote:
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 01:42:58 -0800
From: Ralph Goers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: Unbelievable stack trace
FWIW, I found
PROTECTED]
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: Unbelievable stack trace
FWIW, I found a regexp benchmark at
http://tusker.org/regex/regex_benchmark.html
The times I got on my laptop were
org.apache.regexp
I cannot believe this didn't get a stack overflow exception. We just
happened to request a stack trace of a test system at this time.
I also find myself wondering if EncodeURLTransformer shouldn't be
changed somehow.
http-8088-Processor20 daemon prio=1 tid=0x8a3b8408 nid=0xf55 runnable
I found this bug report for regexp with many duplicates. Apparently it
is pretty popular. I guess Vadim is aware of this. :-)
The bug is closed as WONTFIX.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=764
Ralph Goers wrote:
I cannot believe this didn't get a stack overflow
