Hey, Marc comes back :-)
Marc Portier wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Tim Larson wrote:
I agree: the issue of which expression language to take is another
(practical) counter-argument
(although making the observation that something like this starts
limiting our design-freedom really suggests that
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Tim Larson wrote:
On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 09:29:56PM +0100, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Tim Larson wrote:
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 09:58:43PM +0100, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
So, why do we need *both* versions? Isn't it FS? Can you give some
examples that justify this need? Up to now,
Tim Larson wrote:
On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 09:29:56PM +0100, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Tim Larson wrote:
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 09:58:43PM +0100, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Ok. Does this mean choose/when will replace union/case? Also, the wiki
[1] shows several alternatives for choose/when,
Tim Larson wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 08:54:33PM +0100, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Tim Larson wrote:
I finaly got to look at the widget states implementation,
and even port parts of Swan to use it (working on porting
the rest now). I see some things we can improve, but it
looks good overal
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 08:54:33PM +0100, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> Tim Larson wrote:
> >On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 09:29:40PM +0100, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> >>Tim Larson wrote:
> >>>On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 09:58:43PM +0100, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> Tim Larson wrote:
>
> >>>concerns before. I w
Tim Larson wrote:
On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 09:29:40PM +0100, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Tim Larson wrote:
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 09:58:43PM +0100, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Tim Larson wrote:
concerns before. I will try to take some time this weekend
to see how to resolve this. I re
On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 09:29:56PM +0100, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> Tim Larson wrote:
> >On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 09:58:43PM +0100, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> >
> >>Ok. Does this mean choose/when will replace union/case? Also, the wiki
> >>[1] shows several alternatives for choose/when, and unless I mis
On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 09:29:40PM +0100, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> Tim Larson wrote:
> >On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 09:58:43PM +0100, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> >>Tim Larson wrote:
>
> >concerns before. I will try to take some time this weekend
> >to see how to resolve this. I really do not want to reve
Tim Larson wrote:
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 09:58:43PM +0100, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Ok. Does this mean choose/when will replace union/case? Also, the wiki
[1] shows several alternatives for choose/when, and unless I missed
something we have not decided which approach to use.
Yes, choose/whe
Tim Larson wrote:
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 09:58:43PM +0100, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Tim Larson wrote:
Sorry for this late answer, I was out of office today (woke up a 5am to
go to the airport :-/ )
No problem, we all have different schedules to juggle.
Thank you very much for taking the time
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 09:58:43PM +0100, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> Tim Larson wrote:
>
> Sorry for this late answer, I was out of office today (woke up a 5am to
> go to the airport :-/ )
No problem, we all have different schedules to juggle.
Thank you very much for taking the time to consider and
Tim Larson wrote:
Sorry for this late answer, I was out of office today (woke up a 5am to
go to the airport :-/ )
I have given further thought to some issues that were raised
and this has changed my opinion on branching cforms into the
whiteboard, and caused me to also want to clarify some other
I have given further thought to some issues that were raised
and this has changed my opinion on branching cforms into the
whiteboard, and caused me to also want to clarify some other
issues. I ask that you please read the *whole* email before
starting to form responses :) Details below:
Choose/w
13 matches
Mail list logo
