Re: cvs commit: xml-cocoon2/src/java/org/apache/cocoon/components/language/markup/xsp/java logicsheet-util.xsl util.xsl

2003-10-27 Thread Christian Haul
Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Sorry, mozilla crash marked it as unread :))) Though it must be something like that 8-D Chris. -- C h r i s t i a n H a u l [EMAIL PROTECTED] fingerprint: 99B0 1D9D 7919 644A 4837 7D73 FEF9 6856 335A 9E08

Re: cvs commit: xml-cocoon2/src/java/org/apache/cocoon/components/language/markup/xsp/java logicsheet-util.xsl util.xsl

2003-10-26 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Christian Haul wrote: Vadim Gritsenko wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: haul2002/07/14 08:07:31 Backport to where? If you want to backport fix to 2.0.5-dev (my guess), then you should patch cocoon-2.0 CVS HEAD. PS Why cocoon-2 CVS is allowed to be modified? I guess we decided to make it

Re: cvs commit: xml-cocoon2/src/java/org/apache/cocoon/components/language/markup/xsp/java logicsheet-util.xsl util.xsl

2003-10-26 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: haul2002/07/14 08:07:31 Modified:src/java/org/apache/cocoon/components/language/markup/xsp/java Tag: cocoon_2_0_3_branch logicsheet-util.xsl util.xsl Log: backport fix util.xsl Backport to where? If you want to

Re: cvs commit: xml-cocoon2/src/java/org/apache/cocoon/components/language/markup/xsp/java logicsheet-util.xsl util.xsl

2003-10-26 Thread Antonio Gallardo
Christian Haul dijo: > Vadim Gritsenko wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >>> haul2002/07/14 08:07:31 > >> Backport to where? If you want to backport fix to 2.0.5-dev (my >> guess), then you should patch cocoon-2.0 CVS HEAD. >> >> PS Why cocoon-2 CVS is allowed to be modified? I guess we

Re: cvs commit: xml-cocoon2/src/java/org/apache/cocoon/components/language/markup/xsp/java logicsheet-util.xsl util.xsl

2003-10-26 Thread Christian Haul
Vadim Gritsenko wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: haul2002/07/14 08:07:31 Backport to where? If you want to backport fix to 2.0.5-dev (my guess), then you should patch cocoon-2.0 CVS HEAD. PS Why cocoon-2 CVS is allowed to be modified? I guess we decided to make it read-only? Vadim, could y