what is the woody form binding encoding?

2004-02-11 Thread
error here the form encoding is unicode. If I use action to get the value from the context using JXPathContext is the same result? It must be woody form binding encoding problem. What can I do to solve the problem? roy huang [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN Messenger

what is the woody form binding encoding? sorry for last mail using html format

2004-02-11 Thread
binding encoding problem. What can I do to solve the problem? roy huang [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ MSN Hotmail http://www.hotmail.com

Re: what is the woody form binding encoding?

2004-02-11 Thread Joerg Heinicke
the form encoding is unicode. If I use action to get the value from the context using JXPathContext is the same result? It must be woody form binding encoding problem. What can I do to solve the problem? roy huang

Re: what is the woody form binding encoding?

2004-02-11 Thread
Sorry for sending mail twice,mail list is quite difficult use to me.I must use hotmail in web browser to send the mail(other mail account has pop3 and smtp account can't send mail to this mail list,maybe it is blocked),so I don't know if this mail can be the next thread in the list. I tried

Re: what is the woody form binding encoding?

2004-02-11 Thread Antonio Gallardo
»Æ º£¶¬ dijo: Sorry for sending mail twice,mail list is quite difficult use to me.I must use hotmail in web browser to send the mail(other mail account has pop3 and smtp account can't send mail to this mail list,maybe it is blocked),so I don't know if this mail can be the next thread in

Deprecate JXForms? (Was: what is the woody form binding encoding?)

2004-02-11 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Antonio Gallardo wrote: jxforms are deprecated. if you are starting avoid using jxform. Actually, only xmlform block is officially deprecated (see block.properties). Now, if you think that it should be deprecated, you can start discussion in this thread :-) Vadim

Re: Deprecate JXForms? (Was: what is the woody form binding encoding?)

2004-02-11 Thread Antonio Gallardo
Vadim Gritsenko dijo: Antonio Gallardo wrote: jxforms are deprecated. if you are starting avoid using jxform. Actually, only xmlform block is officially deprecated (see block.properties). Now, if you think that it should be deprecated, you can start discussion in this thread :-) Opss.

Re: Deprecate JXForms? (Was: what is the woody form binding encoding?)

2004-02-11 Thread Christopher Oliver
Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Antonio Gallardo wrote: jxforms are deprecated. if you are starting avoid using jxform. Actually, only xmlform block is officially deprecated (see block.properties). Now, if you think that it should be deprecated, you can start discussion in this thread :-) Vadim

Re: Deprecate JXForms? (Was: what is the woody form binding encoding?)

2004-02-11 Thread Antonio Gallardo
Christopher Oliver dijo: Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Antonio Gallardo wrote: jxforms are deprecated. if you are starting avoid using jxform. Actually, only xmlform block is officially deprecated (see block.properties). Now, if you think that it should be deprecated, you can start discussion

Re: Deprecate JXForms? (Was: what is the woody form binding encoding?)

2004-02-11 Thread Alan
* Antonio Gallardo [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-02-12 03:37]: Christopher Oliver dijo: Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Antonio Gallardo wrote: jxforms are deprecated. if you are starting avoid using jxform. Actually, only xmlform block is officially deprecated (see block.properties). Now,