Re: [DBCP] 1.3 release?

2007-12-07 Thread Phil Steitz
On Dec 6, 2007 7:32 PM, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I see that a 1.3 commons-dbcp release has been discussed a couple of > times on the list. Can someone help me understand where things stand, > currently? I just did a little cleanup so the JIRA issues with 1.3 fix version are what I

Re: Tomcat DBCP with Oracle JDBC OCI 10g driver

2007-12-07 Thread Henri Yandell
When you say it crashes the JVM; how is it crashing it? Hen On Dec 7, 2007 12:37 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To Whom It May Concern, > > Does anyone have a checklist for implementing Oracle JDBC OCI 10g driver > in the Tomcat server DBCP connection pool. It seems very simple > according to

Re: [all] m2 release process

2007-12-07 Thread Wendy Smoak
On Dec 7, 2007 4:32 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We seriously need to remove the "dummy" repo setting from the parent > pom. It does nothing but cause grief. > > If we remove it, calling 'mvn release:perform will copy the artifacts to > the snapshot repo if the version is a SNA

Re: [all] m2 release process

2007-12-07 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Dec 7, 2007 11:51 PM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Dec 7, 2007 11:32 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Niall Pemberton wrote: > > > On Dec 7, 2007 9:01 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> For logging I followed the current release procedure

Re: [all] m2 release process

2007-12-07 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Dec 7, 2007 11:32 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Niall Pemberton wrote: > > On Dec 7, 2007 9:01 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> For logging I followed the current release procedure [1], which worked > >> well. Sections 11 and 12 need to be merged somehow. As

Re: [all] m2 release process

2007-12-07 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Niall Pemberton wrote: On Dec 7, 2007 9:01 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: For logging I followed the current release procedure [1], which worked well. Sections 11 and 12 need to be merged somehow. As I'm not familiar with releases back in the Jakarta days, I'm not quite sure how

Re: [all] m2 release process

2007-12-07 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Dec 7, 2007 9:31 PM, Ben Speakmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I remember when I did it that I had checked out the tag from SVN and done > the release:perform voodoo from there. I didn't get anywhere fast with > -DconnectionUrl, but I couldn't tell you why not. The -DconnectionUrl voodoo seemed

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Commons FileUpload

2007-12-07 Thread Continuum VMBuild Server
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=26654&projectId=166 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Failed Started at: Fri 7 Dec 2007 13:34:12 -0800 Finished at: Fri 7 Dec 2007 13:34:30 -0800 Total time: 17s Build Trigger: Schedule Build Numb

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Commons FileUpload

2007-12-07 Thread Continuum VMBuild Server
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=26654&projectId=166 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Failed Started at: Fri 7 Dec 2007 13:34:12 -0800 Finished at: Fri 7 Dec 2007 13:34:30 -0800 Total time: 17s Build Trigger: Schedule Build Numb

Re: [all] m2 release process

2007-12-07 Thread Ben Speakmon
I remember when I did it that I had checked out the tag from SVN and done the release:perform voodoo from there. I didn't get anywhere fast with -DconnectionUrl, but I couldn't tell you why not. *kicking self for not documenting that at time, KNEW it was gonna come back to haunt me* On Dec 7, 200

Re: [all] m2 release process

2007-12-07 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Dec 7, 2007 9:15 PM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 7, 2007 9:01 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > For logging I followed the current release procedure [1], which worked > > well. Sections 11 and 12 need to be merged somehow. As I'm not familiar > > with rel

Re: [all] m2 release process

2007-12-07 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Dec 7, 2007 9:01 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For logging I followed the current release procedure [1], which worked > well. Sections 11 and 12 need to be merged somehow. As I'm not familiar > with releases back in the Jakarta days, I'm not quite sure how to > though. Other t

Re: [all] m2 release process

2007-12-07 Thread Ben Speakmon
Also, since we sign RCs instead of just the final approved build, that part of the doc should move to preparation instead of release. On Dec 7, 2007 1:01 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For logging I followed the current release procedure [1], which worked > well. Sections 11 and

Re: [all] m2 release process

2007-12-07 Thread Dennis Lundberg
For logging I followed the current release procedure [1], which worked well. Sections 11 and 12 need to be merged somehow. As I'm not familiar with releases back in the Jakarta days, I'm not quite sure how to though. Other than that, it was obvious what to when the docs talk about Maven 1 speci

Tomcat DBCP with Oracle JDBC OCI 10g driver

2007-12-07 Thread Jeffrey.Constantin
To Whom It May Concern, Does anyone have a checklist for implementing Oracle JDBC OCI 10g driver in the Tomcat server DBCP connection pool. It seems very simple according to directions from Oracle but I must be missing one piece. I have confirmed the external setup with tnsnames.ora and the oracl

Re: [all] m2 release process

2007-12-07 Thread Ben Speakmon
I did email 1.1 with it; I updated the release docs in commons-build with some of what I learned. The only part not documented is publishing m2 artifacts to maven.org, but I was able to figure it out without much trouble. On Dec 7, 2007 10:58 AM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I hav

[all] m2 release process

2007-12-07 Thread Niall Pemberton
I haven't done an m2 release before - do we have it documented anywhere or can someone give me some pointers on what commands and options I need to use? tia Niall P.S. This is for commons-skin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL P

Re: [logging] change groupId (Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release commons-logging 1.1.1 (take 4))

2007-12-07 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Joerg Hohwiller wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi there, ...and we have a winner! I am a little late ;) Could you please change the groupId to "org.apache.commons.logging". It is an ugly legacy problem that many projects are still ignoring the maven conventions. Here ar

Re: [logging] maven: deploy *-sources.jar as well

2007-12-07 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Starting with the recently release version 1.1.1 we do that: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/commons-logging/commons-logging/1.1.1/ Joerg Hohwiller wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi there, could you also generate the sources.jar files? http://maven.apache.org/plugins/mave