To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
Thi
Tags should never be recreated.
It would be better to create an RC(n) tag for the VOTE; if the vote
fails, delete the tag, fix the files and create a new RC(n+1) tag.
Once the vote passes, the RC tag can be copied to the final release tag.
That makes it much easier to keep track of the tags.
S.
Hi all
After the RC inspection a week or so ago, I am putting up a candidate
for release. Based on the feedback on the RC, I have made the following
changes:
* Excluded the examples/ classes from the binary jar
* Put LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt in META-INF in the FTP-only jar
* Fixed some oddi
Phil Steitz a écrit :
> I just added a 2.1 and moved some issues out. All were enhancement
> requests without patches and no assignee. Pls all feel free to revert
> any that you feel really need to be in 2.0.I "claimed" a few of the
> 2.0 issues. Of course this just means that I will work on
I just added a 2.1 and moved some issues out. All were enhancement
requests without patches and no assignee. Pls all feel free to revert
any that you feel really need to be in 2.0.I "claimed" a few of the
2.0 issues. Of course this just means that I will work on these if no
one beats me
