If I have read it right, I do agree with the point that we need to give
committers access to people more freely.
Suggested solution of having a separate development branch sounds good to me
(don't know how feasible it is).
-v
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
Hi Russel,
Forgive me for butting in on a conversation but . . .
Anytime :)
Isn't this whole Subversion centralism problem solved by using a DVCS
such as Bazaar, or Git -- and soon, I gather, Mercurial.
Yes, kind of - I've only recently come across Git and the concept of DVCS
but it was m
Hi Paul,
I wasn't talking about *writing the documentation* but cleanly linking to
it.
Ah, ISWYM! In that case I completely agree :)
I am prepared to upgrade Jelly to Maven2 (not that I know much about
what that involves, yet)
I would rather disadvise that especially for the huge effort of
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would strongly protest against such a move.
I wasn't proposing such a move, merely speculating.
> Commons are used outside
> of the ASF and are successful there. I even think [math] is used almost
> only outside of AS
Hi Markus,
I opened a JIRA a while ago
(http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EMAIL-77) to no avail. So it seems
that commons-email do need some additional attention :-).
+) well, during the next 2-3 weeks I try to get my commons-exec release
out of the door (politely spoken the release is ov
I don't think this is a bug, CBZip2InputStream ignores the 2 bytes
header by design (not sure why though). This is documented in the javadoc.
Emmanuel Bourg
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e
Le 09-nov.-08 à 05:35, John Spackman a écrit :
I agree that the website needs some changes although I had thought
that this was largely for broken links and for a consistent left-
hand side menu; updating the documentation for the taglibs is a
pretty herculean task, not least because in orde
On 11/9/08, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Jochen Wiedmann
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 7:51 PM, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > For example, one of the reasons people don't want to bring things to
> > Commo
Martin Cooper a écrit :
> Interesting post. Allow me to do some thinking out loud of my own. ;-)
>
> IMHO, in its earlier days, Commons worked well in that quite a few projects
> did "donate" parts of their code bases to Commons, thus seeding it and
> enhancing the commonality between those projec
On 09/11/2008, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Jochen Wiedmann
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>
> > On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 7:51 PM, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > For example, one of the reasons people don't want to bring things to
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
Thi
11 matches
Mail list logo
