Re: [g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-ant (in module commons-jelly) failed

2008-12-02 Thread Paul Libbrecht
Thanks Stefan, I will fix this, most probably today. Except rolling back it's not really easy... It took me a while to understand why I could not reproduce it but now I know that it is because many taglibs aren't flagged to depend on jelly core snapshot, which I will change now. paul Le

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2008-12-02 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community integration.

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-math (in module apache-commons) failed

2008-12-02 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-math has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2008-12-02 Thread commons-jelly development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-ant (in module commons-jelly) failed

2008-12-02 Thread commons-jelly-tags-ant development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-ant has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2008-12-02 Thread commons-jelly-tags-define development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-define (in module commons-jelly) failed

2008-12-02 Thread commons-jelly-tags-define development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-define has an issue affecting its community integration.

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-beanshell (in module commons-jelly) failed

2008-12-02 Thread commons-jelly-tags-beanshell development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-beanshell has an issue affecting its community integration.

Re: [g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-ant (in module commons-jelly) failed

2008-12-02 Thread Stefan Bodewig
This one is an incompatible interface change in Expression.java (added a throws clause to several methods) introduced with http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/jelly/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/jelly/expression/Expression.java?r1=718134r2=718133pathrev=718134 Some other jelly-tags

Re: [math] patch submitted for commons-math sparse matrix support

2008-12-02 Thread luc . maisonobe
- Ted Dunning [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : Is performance in LUD normally achieved by fast element access? Or is it done by using higher order operators on a view of a row (or column)? This is not used for LUD but only for simpler operations (multiplication, addition, subtraction). For

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-math (in module apache-commons) failed

2008-12-02 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-math has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

Re: [math] patch submitted for commons-math sparse matrix support

2008-12-02 Thread Sujit Pal
I've updated MATH-230 with a fresh patch (this time against trunk, since MATH_2_0 has been moved to trunk) putting back the fallback code Luc pointed out was used for performance. Details are in the bug: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-230 There are also some test times for running

Re: [math] Matrix decomposition API

2008-12-02 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Phil Steitz a écrit : There are a couple of things about the decomposition API that are starting to bug me. Apologies for not having raised them until now, since they apply to LU as well as the new Eigen decomp. 1) I don't like the state dependencies bleeding into the decomposition

Re: [math] Matrix decomposition API

2008-12-02 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Luc Maisonobe a écrit : Phil Steitz a écrit : There are a couple of things about the decomposition API that are starting to bug me. Apologies for not having raised them until now, since they apply to LU as well as the new Eigen decomp. 1) I don't like the state dependencies bleeding into

Re: [math] patch submitted for commons-math sparse matrix support

2008-12-02 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Sujit Pal a écrit : I've updated MATH-230 with a fresh patch (this time against trunk, since MATH_2_0 has been moved to trunk) putting back the fallback code Luc pointed out was used for performance. Thanks. Details are in the bug: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-230 There

Re: [math] Matrix decomposition API

2008-12-02 Thread Phil Steitz
Luc Maisonobe wrote: Luc Maisonobe a écrit : Phil Steitz a écrit : There are a couple of things about the decomposition API that are starting to bug me. Apologies for not having raised them until now, since they apply to LU as well as the new Eigen decomp. 1) I don't like the state