To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-configuration has an issue affecting its community integration.
Th
On 03/01/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 11:10 PM, Rahul Akolkar
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 6:31 PM, sebb wrote:
> >> On 02/01/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 2:03 PM, wrote:
> >>> > Author: sebb
> >>> > Date: Fri Jan 2 11:03:42 20
Ted Dunning wrote:
I just check on how sbcl handles this. The result was mixed, but
instructive as predicted.
Positive and negative infinity behave as expected.
** (/ 1 0.0)
#.SB-EXT:SINGLE-FLOAT-POSITIVE-INFINITY
* (/ -1 0.0)
*
***#.SB-EXT:SINGLE-FLOAT-NEGATIVE-INFINITY
*
Square roots of ne
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
Phil -
Thanks for taking a look. Did you intend to vote on the 1.8.1 thread
instead? The 2.0 vote (this thread) has closed, while the 1.8.1 one is
still active (for another few hours).
-Rahul
Sorry, I have been digging out of a backlog here and what I validated
was th
Luc Maisonobe wrote:
The decomposition/solvers API has changed several times these last
weeks, but I would like to introduce one new change.
The current status is something similar to:
RealVector x = new XyzSolver(new XyzDecomposition(a)).solve(b);
I would like to change it to:
RealVecto
Phil Steitz a écrit :
> Ted Dunning wrote:
>> I just check on how sbcl handles this. The result was mixed, but
>> instructive as predicted.
>>
>> Positive and negative infinity behave as expected.
>>
>> ** (/ 1 0.0)
>> #.SB-EXT:SINGLE-FLOAT-POSITIVE-INFINITY
>>
>> * (/ -1 0.0)
>> *
>> ***#.SB-EXT:
Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Phil Steitz a écrit :
Ted Dunning wrote:
I just check on how sbcl handles this. The result was mixed, but
instructive as predicted.
Positive and negative infinity behave as expected.
** (/ 1 0.0)
#.SB-EXT:SINGLE-FLOAT-POSITIVE-INFINITY
* (/ -1 0.0)
*
***#.SB-EXT
Bradford Cross wrote:
The list might recall when I was working on so-called rolling statistics
last year. I needed to use C# so I had to port what I needed from
commons-math and extend for the rolling cases, and put it together with a
pre-existing library.
You might be interested in the project
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>>
>> Phil -
>>
>> Thanks for taking a look. Did you intend to vote on the 1.8.1 thread
>> instead? The 2.0 vote (this thread) has closed, while the 1.8.1 one is
>> still active (for another few hours).
>>
>> -Rahul
>>
>>
>
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 5:54 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 03/01/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>>
>> Fixed. Many of the test documents were using old-school attribute
>> names that broke the tests when the corresponding deprecated methods
>> were removed. While these didn't show up as compile-time referen
This vote has passed with 5 +1s from:
Luc Maisonobe
Oliver Heger
Rahul Akolkar
Jörg Schaible
Phil Steitz (see recent v2.0 vote thread for vote cast)
Thanks to everyone for taking a look, especially during the holidays.
I will complete the pending tasks for both v1.8.1 and v2.0 and send
out anno
"Mark Thomas" wrote in message
news:495df12a.3010...@apache.org...
> Bill Barker wrote:
>> "Mark Thomas" wrote in message
>> news:495cc923.5020...@apache.org...
>>> Folks,
>>>
>>> I have been working through some Tomcat bug reports and there are a
>>> number
>>> of
>>> commons-daemon issues -
So if the project PMC still see the value of procrun but has difficulty to
have a current committer interested in maintaining it, I'm more than glad to
help. I don't have the credit that Mark has. But I have spent quite some
time with the source code of procrun and am pretty confident to maintain i
Mark Thomas wrote:
Therefore, I'd like to request commit access to commons daemon. All the
paperwork is in place (I am a Tomcat committer and ASF member amongst other
things) but I understand completely if you'd rather a current commons committer
did the actual commits. Let me know how you want
14 matches
Mail list logo