[VOTE] CLI 1.2 release (RC1)

2009-02-05 Thread Henri Yandell
Pushing out a first RC for CLI-1.x. It's a bit of an odd duck in that it uses CLI2's site. --- Tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/cli/tags/cli-1.2-RC1 Site: http://people.apache.org/~bayard/cli-1.2-rc1/ Binaries: http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/cli/1.2/RC1/staged/co

Re: Proposal: Commons SAX

2009-02-05 Thread Henri Yandell
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 1:25 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 8:55 AM, Jukka Zitting > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Until we come up with consensus on where (Commons, Xerces or Cocoon) >> we should place this proposed library, I'd like to start putting some >> bits together in the Commo

Re: Commons - CLI 2.0

2009-02-05 Thread Henri Yandell
Maybe the release would get it off the ground. I'm thinking that we stop thinking of CLI 1.x and CLI 2.0 (branches of one product); but rather CLI and CLI2; ie) two separate components with their own sites. That might free each to stop being hamstrung by the other. Hen On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:5

Re: Commons CLI

2009-02-05 Thread Henri Yandell
* pom.xml is easy enough to fix after the change - irritating to have to do the extra commit. * RAT entries fixed. Source header added to 3 files and the build.xml/build.properties dumped as I don't think they have enough value for the maintenance cost (they're maven1 generated). * I dumped the C

Re: [compress] SANDBOX-246 remaining Findbugs issues

2009-02-05 Thread Christian Grobmeier
> The svn merges were more or less painless, the only conflict I got was > in UnknownExtraField because the commons-compress version uses m_foo > fields where Ant uses foo (likely because of Avalon/Peter Donald > coding style). If you could do that - yes, thats cool then. > I suggest we add the n

Re: [compress] SANDBOX-246 remaining Findbugs issues

2009-02-05 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2009-02-05, Christian Grobmeier wrote: >> * ZipOutputStream contains some proteted static final byte[] >> "constants" >> This means any subclass could modify them. Findbugs suggests to >> make the package private. Ant couldn't do that because of backwards >> incompatibility, but a sandb

Re: [EMAIL] Anyone home?

2009-02-05 Thread Corey Scott
Paul, They have been uploaded for a while, hence me previous mail. Siegfried, Glad to here its not dead, its always been a slowly evolving project, I guess I just forgot this :) Cheers, Corey Paul Benedict wrote: Corey, Please create patches for those tickets (and create new tickets as n

Re: Proposal: Commons SAX

2009-02-05 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Until we come up with consensus on where (Commons, Xerces or Cocoon) > we should place this proposed library, I'd like to start putting some > bits together in the Commons Sandbox. I've now set up a project skeleton at https://svn.apach

Re: Commons CLI

2009-02-05 Thread Siegfried Goeschl
Hi Henri, +) I double-checked the project and committed the changes (to my best knowledge) +) made "mvn release:prepare -DdryRun=true" and the ASL is gone in pom.xml - no idea why ... :-( +) RAT report complains about 4 files - this needs to be fixed to keep Sebastian happy (no offense intended) +

[pipeline] documentation patch submitted

2009-02-05 Thread Ken Tanaka
I submitted a small documentation fix for the pipeline_basics tutorial. After uploading the initial documentation, I noticed that some of the code examples had extra line feeds, mainly the xml configuration samples that use color also use boldface to emphasize some of the keywords. At least on

Re: [all] Use of svn keywords in source files

2009-02-05 Thread Siegfried Goeschl
I guess they are a left-over from CVS Siegfried Goeschl Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a particular reason why we use svn keywords like $Id$? I've > personally never found them very useful (the version number in a jar > file is much more informative), and the keywords often confuse diff

Re: [compress] SANDBOX-246 remaining Findbugs issues

2009-02-05 Thread sebb
On 05/02/2009, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Hi, > thanks Stefan for running findbugs! I'll try to give answers as far as > I know till now. > > > > * JarArchiveEntry certificates and manifestAttributes is never written > > to, so they are useless. > > > > I'm unsure of the class' purpose a

Re: [EMAIL] Anyone home?

2009-02-05 Thread Siegfried Goeschl
Hi Corey, commons-email is not dead - I did a few bugfixes recently. So please double-check +) what is still open +) what should should get into the next release Thanks in advance Siegfried Goeschl Corey Scott wrote: > Is there anyone left that can commit to Email? > > I have a few patches pe

Re: Commons CLI

2009-02-05 Thread Siegfried Goeschl
Hi Henri, my workload still looks depressing so I would appreciate it very much if you could cut the release. Having said that I want to update the pom.xml because a release would not work properly. After a couple of rejected release candidates I'm the local expert for the "maven release-prepare"

Request sandbox access

2009-02-05 Thread Dan Fabulich
I just submitted a big patch to DbUtils to update the API to use Java 5 features (generics, varargs). http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBUTILS-48 There really aren't very many bugs left in this project; almost all of them have patches attached. I think it wouldn't be much work for someb

Re: [all] Use of svn keywords in source files

2009-02-05 Thread Torsten Curdt
I am no fan of them either. Never use them. cheers -- Torsten On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 16:19, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a particular reason why we use svn keywords like $Id$? I've > personally never found them very useful (the version number in a jar > file is much more informative),

[all] Use of svn keywords in source files

2009-02-05 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, Is there a particular reason why we use svn keywords like $Id$? I've personally never found them very useful (the version number in a jar file is much more informative), and the keywords often confuse diff and merge tools. I'm relatively new here, so this probably has been discussed at length

Re: [compress] SANDBOX-246 remaining Findbugs issues

2009-02-05 Thread Christian Grobmeier
Hi, thanks Stefan for running findbugs! I'll try to give answers as far as I know till now. > * JarArchiveEntry certificates and manifestAttributes is never written > to, so they are useless. > > I'm unsure of the class' purpose and simply left things as they are, > assuming setters will be pro

[compress] SANDBOX-246 remaining Findbugs issues

2009-02-05 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Since Sebb's original report the code base has changed quite a bit so I reran findbugs. I've fixed most of them, still open are: * JarArchiveEntry certificates and manifestAttributes is never written to, so they are useless. I'm unsure of the class' purpose and simply left things as they are

Re: Commons - CLI 2.0

2009-02-05 Thread Rory Winston
Actually I think Hadoop might also have a dependency on CLI-2.0, so it may be good to get an official release out for them as well: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/core/trunk/ivy/hadoop-core.pom?revision=726872&view=markup I dont know anything about CLI, but I may be able to assist someone

Re: Commons - CLI 2.0

2009-02-05 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi there, Yep - I don't know of anyone with strong interest in CLI2, which should be viewed as an experimental unreleased branch imo. I'm really interessted in it, cause I'm using this state im my project, cause the usage is very simple and gives me exactly what i need... http://www.supose.o