On May 5, 2009, at 11:15 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
James Carman wrote at Mittwoch, 6. Mai 2009 03:12:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Matt Benson
wrote:
I feel differently--how many times do we need to duplicate code
that does
the same damned thing amongst the various components? For
>> I'd vote for this signature being valid to sign releases. Only incubator
>> releases right now, since it hasn't been signed by the Apache WOT. That can
>> be fixed at a Sign-a-Thon. ;-)
>>
> I'd vote for Apache Commons releases signed by any key thats in the
> KEYS file (regardless of WOT status
Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Maybe it's also time to think about more fine grained artifacts. With Maven
> the dependency management is no longer that worse. We could have
>
> collections-x.y.jar
> collections-functor-x.y.jar
>
> with the latter providing the stuff of collections depending on funct
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
> Much better!
>
> [CraigRussell:~/Downloads] clr% gpg --verify
> commons-chain-1.2-bin.tar.gz.asc
> gpg: Signature made Tue May 5 22:13:09 2009 PDT using DSA key ID 42196CA8
> gpg: Good signature from "Christian Grobmeier (Apache Codesigni
Thanks, Luc. I am fine with the change. You're right that in this (and
lots if other cases), we should be either looking at relative error or
setting tolerances by element.
On 5/6/09, luc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
> The first element in the reference table has a large magnitude (3.48e6). The
> err
Much better!
[CraigRussell:~/Downloads] clr% gpg --recv-keys 42196CA8
gpg: requesting key 42196CA8 from hkp server subkeys.pgp.net
gpg: key 42196CA8: public key "Christian Grobmeier (Apache
Codesigning) " imported
gpg: 3 marginal(s) needed, 1 complete(s) needed, PGP trust model
gpg: depth: 0
The first element in the reference table has a large magnitude (3.48e6). The
error tolerance was 1.0e-8 which was 14 digits smaller. The change from
RealMatrix to RealVector scheduled the numeric operations differently, despite
the same values should theoretically be computed (the matrix used wa
--- On Wed, 5/6/09, Torsten Curdt wrote:
> From: Torsten Curdt
> Subject: Re: [COLLECTIONS] 3.3 release
> To: "Commons Developers List"
> Date: Wednesday, May 6, 2009, 2:47 AM
> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 03:04, James
> Carman
> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 8:46 PM, Torsten Curdt
> wrote:
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-ojb has an issue affecting its community integration.
T
--- On Wed, 5/6/09, sebb wrote:
> From: sebb
> Subject: Re: [COLLECTIONS] 3.3 release
> To: "Commons Developers List"
> Date: Wednesday, May 6, 2009, 6:22 AM
> On 06/05/2009, Matt Benson
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- On Tue, 5/5/09, sebb
> wrote:
[SNIP]
> > > ExtendedProperties still need
>> http://people.apache.org/~grobmeier/test/grobmeier-codesigning.pub
>
> Thanks, that has allowed me to check the signature. Validates OK.
Cool!
> However I was unable to download the key from a keyserver - maybe
> there was a problem with the server I was using.
Strange... I uploaded it to: pg
On 06/05/2009, Matt Benson wrote:
>
>
>
> --- On Tue, 5/5/09, sebb wrote:
>
> > From: sebb
>
> > Subject: Re: [COLLECTIONS] 3.3 release
> > To: "Commons Developers List"
>
> > Date: Tuesday, May 5, 2009, 6:02 PM
>
> > On 05/05/2009, Matt Benson
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- O
On 06/05/2009, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> > Can you upload the public key?
>
>
> http://people.apache.org/~grobmeier/test/grobmeier-codesigning.pub
>
Thanks, that has allowed me to check the signature. Validates OK.
However I was unable to download the key from a keyserver - maybe
there was a
> Can you upload the public key?
http://people.apache.org/~grobmeier/test/grobmeier-codesigning.pub
> It will need to be added to KEYS at some point if you are to use it.
Yes. I didn't understood when a key is beeing considered "trusted" at apache.
Meanwhile I think there is not such a policy. H
On 06/05/2009, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> > gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
> > [CraigRussell:~/Downloads] clr% gpg --recv-keys 42196CA8
> > gpg: requesting key 42196CA8 from hkp server subkeys.pgp.net
> > gpgkeys: key 42196CA8 not found on keyserver
>
>
> Thanks, i sent it t
/**
Modified:
commons/proper/math/trunk/src/test/org/apache/commons/math/stat/regression/OLSMultipleLinearRegressionTest.java
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/math/trunk/src/test/org/apache/commons/math/stat/regression/OLSMultipleLinearRegressionTest.java?rev=772114&r1=772
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community
integrati
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 03:04, James Carman wrote:
> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 8:46 PM, Torsten Curdt wrote:
>>> Using what strategy, Torsten?
>>
>> Not sure I understand the question. But let's try:
>
> I think the question was "using what existing
> technology/framework/tool/etc"? Something like u
18 matches
Mail list logo
