- Original Message -
From: "Luc Maisonobe"
To: "Commons Developers List"
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 4:19 AM
Subject: Re: [math] Serialization
[I changed the subject to help follow the thread]
Phil Steitz a écrit :
Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Ted Dunning a écrit :
In favor or not, Ser
Hmm. It's a really great idea.
I think It could be a top level math project of apache.
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Sam Halliday wrote:
>
> Edward, Hama looks fantastic! I fully agree, 'distributed' isn't agreeable
> with commons-math. However, there might be parts of it that are relevant to
On 23/05/2009, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 4:01 AM, sebb wrote:
> > On 22/05/2009, Henri Yandell wrote:
> >> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 3:22 AM, sebb wrote:
> >>
> >> > [I think the DOAP files should not be in trunk at all]
> >>
> >> Agreed. We should move them up a dire
>> Next dev. snapshot is 1.1.
>
> One has to wonder why we put the version number on the site :) It's
> completely meaningless and just leads to confusion.
>
> I think it dates in Maven from the notion that your site would be your
> documentation. However websites serve a completely different purpo
On 23/05/2009, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 3:56 AM, sebb wrote:
> > On 22/05/2009, Henri Yandell wrote:
> >> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 8:24 AM, sebb wrote:
> >> > On 21/05/2009, Henri Yandell wrote:
> >> >> I don't expect this to pass the first vote - they never do :)
>
On 23/05/2009, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> >> Next dev. snapshot is 1.1.
> >
> > One has to wonder why we put the version number on the site :) It's
> > completely meaningless and just leads to confusion.
> >
> > I think it dates in Maven from the notion that your site would be your
> > doc
On 23/05/2009, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 6:14 AM, sebb wrote:
> > On 22/05/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 7:08 AM, sebb wrote:
> >> > On 22/05/2009, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> >> >> > Another minor glitch I noticed just now. All pages seem
sebb wrote:
Given that this process has stalled
It has indeed stalled. Nevertheless, it was an interesting
discussion. The openness demonstrated by this group is unusual as it
is refreshing. It seems that ultimately the status quo (inaction) won
the day which is not entirely surprising in the
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 8:57 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 23/05/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 7:01 PM, sebb wrote:
>> > On 22/05/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>> >> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:14 AM, sebb wrote:
>> >> > On 22/05/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>> >> >> On Fri, May
(apologies for jumping in half way through)
luc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Considering the ongoing discussion in another thread, the current changes
> that have been done on
> [math] for the last months belong to the major changes with large
> incompatibilities with previous version
that is the question
having taken a look at the JIRAs, most seem to be tangled up with API
revisions...
i suppose this brings us to the fundamental question: whether to ship
basically the API we have, or to engage in a redesign exercise.
opinions?
- robert
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> (apologies for jumping in half way through)
>
> luc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Considering the ongoing discussion in another thread, the current changes
>> that have been done on
>> [math] for the last months belong to
+1 for redesigning. mainly, the JDBC resource and maybe generifying the APIs
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin <
robertburrelldon...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> that is the question
>
> having taken a look at the JIRAs, most seem to be tangled up with API
> revisions...
>
> i
I like the idea about the "top level math project":) Is it possible or
interesting to host a sub-project for DSL to commons-math?(such as an
enhanced Object-supported matlab-compatible script)
2009/5/23 Edward J. Yoon
> Hmm. It's a really great idea.
>
> I think It could be a top level math pro
Rahul Akolkar a écrit :
> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
> wrote:
>> (apologies for jumping in half way through)
>>
>> luc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Considering the ongoing discussion in another thread, the current changes
>>> that have been done on
>>> [
On 21/05/2009, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 21.05.2009 13:12, pste...@apache.org wrote:
> > Modified:
> commons/proper/pool/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/pool/impl/GenericObjectPool.java
> > URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/pool/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/pool/impl/Gene
Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Rahul Akolkar a écrit :
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
(apologies for jumping in half way through)
luc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
Hello,
Considering the ongoing discussion in another thread, the current changes that
have been
Henri Yandell wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Luc Maisonobe a écrit :
So let's vote on this proposal: change the top level package name on
[math] from org.apache.commons.math to org.apache.commons.math2.
[] +1 change the top level package name
[] 0 I don
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Of course, our way here is to come to agreement and it looks like we have
> not done that in this case. My original vote (+1) was partly for
> consistency with the rest of commons and out of fear of "jar hell"
> scenarios. I was swayed by Ni
That's a very good idea IMO.
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> (apologies for jumping in half way through)
>
> luc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Considering the ongoing discussion in another thread, the current changes
>> that have been done on
>> [math]
James Carman a écrit :
> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> Of course, our way here is to come to agreement and it looks like we have
>> not done that in this case. My original vote (+1) was partly for
>> consistency with the rest of commons and out of fear of "jar hell"
>> s
> > Of course, our way here is to come to agreement and it looks like we have
> > not done that in this case. My original vote (+1) was partly for
> > consistency with the rest of commons and out of fear of "jar hell"
> > scenarios. I was swayed by Niall's argument and reflection on use cases
> >
sebb wrote:
On 21/05/2009, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 21.05.2009 13:12, pste...@apache.org wrote:
> Modified:
commons/proper/pool/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/pool/impl/GenericObjectPool.java
> URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/pool/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/pool/i
-1 to a TLP at the current time.
I really agree that the current momentum may be a flash.
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 6:28 AM, Jin Mingjian wrote:
> I like the idea about the "top level math project":) Is it possible or
> interesting to host a sub-project for DSL to commons-math?(such as an
> enhan
Perf testing has gone well so far. I have one more batch of javadoc /
ridiculously-long-line elimination changes to commit and then I will cut
an RC. There are a couple of things that I want to get community input
on before plowing forward with the RC.
0) @author tags. This has been discus
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> 1) Release process. I am NOT planning on using the maven release plugin. I
> will get working assemblies to create tarballs, make tags, named RC1, 2 (NOT
> "mutable" release tags) and push the tarballs and jar artifacts manually to
> the mirr
Here's my take on graduating Sanselan from incubator to commons.
1. Sanselan has been accepted by Commons.
2. The active committers have been granted write access to the
repository.
Remaining issues:
1. Deciding on the package name for sanselan at commons.
2. Deciding on the brand name for s
Sounds good.
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
> Here's my take on graduating Sanselan from incubator to commons.
>
> 1. Sanselan has been accepted by Commons.
> 2. The active committers have been granted write access to the repository.
>
> Remaining issues:
>
> 1. Deciding
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 5:34 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> (apologies for jumping in half way through)
>
> luc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Considering the ongoing discussion in another thread, the current changes
>> that have been done on
>> [math] for the last months belong to
Henri Yandell wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 6:14 AM, sebb wrote:
On 22/05/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 7:08 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 22/05/2009, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> > Another minor glitch I noticed just now. All pages seem to include a
>> > green "1.
Henri Yandell wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 4:01 AM, sebb wrote:
On 22/05/2009, Henri Yandell wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 3:22 AM, sebb wrote:
> [I think the DOAP files should not be in trunk at all]
Agreed. We should move them up a directory.
Or more - why not just h
31 matches
Mail list logo
