Original Message
Subject:Re: maven-metatdata.xml for first m2 releases
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 14:31:37 -0700
From: Carlos Sanchez
Reply-To: reposit...@apache.org
To: reposit...@apache.org
References: <4a32c91b.1050...@steitz.com>
I think there was
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Libbrecht"
To: "Commons Developers List"
Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2009 2:33 PM
Subject: Re: [jexl] Remove Maven 1 support from 2.0 branch?
Won't this break anything that uses Maven 1 and jexl as dependency in
Gump? Is there a way around here?
I'm thi
Won't this break anything that uses Maven 1 and jexl as dependency in
Gump? Is there a way around here?
I'm thinking of jelly at least.
paul
On 13-juin-09, at 13:11, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Hi there,
just thought it would be nice removing M1 support from the 2.0 branch,
which deals with
testBorrowObjectFairness() in TestGenericObjectPool failed once when
building, but worked for the 2nd trial.
The manifest of the javadocs jar does not contain the extended entries
contained in the sources jar.
Of course, no blockers, so +1
Oliver
Phil Steitz wrote:
> Pool 1.5 contained a nasty
Phil Steitz a écrit :
> Pool 1.5 contained a nasty regression (POOL-144) that has been fixed.
> Version 1.5.1 contains a fix for this bug.
>
> The tag is here:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/pool/tags/POOL_1_5_1_RC1/
>
> The release distribution files are here:
> http://people.
Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Phil Steitz a écrit :
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 10:42 PM, Phil Steitz
wrote:
POOL-141 is asking for source jars for old versions of [pool] to be
pushed
to maven central. I think we talked about this before in relation to
another compon
Phil Steitz a écrit :
> Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 10:42 PM, Phil Steitz
>> wrote:
>>
>>> POOL-141 is asking for source jars for old versions of [pool] to be
>>> pushed
>>> to maven central. I think we talked about this before in relation to
>>> another component, but I can
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-fmt-test has an issue affecting its community
integrat
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-email has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
> Thanks a lot Christian. I promise next patches will be smaller.
Good :-)
> I noticed a few things whilst re-reviewing;
> I goofed when moving back to commons logging (there are remnants of
> java.util.logging in a few places) and I'll address this in the next (small)
> patch (the o.a.c.jexl.Log
Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>
> I just applied the patch.
> Henri, please make sure to make smaller patches :-) This one was quite
> hard to review :-)
> Hope I got it all in correctly, you may want to have a look.
>
> Thanks guy!
> Christian
>
>
Thanks a lot Christian. I promise next patche
Phil Steitz wrote:
> Pool 1.5 contained a nasty regression (POOL-144) that has been fixed.
> Version 1.5.1 contains a fix for this bug.
>
> The tag is here:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/pool/tags/POOL_1_5_1_RC1/
>
> The release distribution files are here:
> http://people.apa
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community
integrati
2009/6/13 Phil Steitz
> Pool 1.5 contained a nasty regression (POOL-144) that has been fixed.
> Version 1.5.1 contains a fix for this bug.
>
> The tag is here:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/pool/tags/POOL_1_5_1_RC1/
>
> The release distribution files are here:
> http://people.
+1.
Sigs good. Archives equivalent. Source builds on Maven2 and Ant [JDK
1.5 on OS X 10.4]. Release notes look good, license/notice looks good
(jars contain both). POOL-144 seems good.
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Pool 1.5 contained a nasty regression (POOL-144) that has
I've rewritten StringEscapeUtils by putting a mini-framework underneath it:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-505
On the one hand, Lang has not been a place for frameworks. On the
other hand, StringEscapeUtils has repeatedly shown a need to be much
more pluggable and not tie the user int
16 matches
Mail list logo
