Re: [Codec] Codec 1.4 RC1 available for review

2009-07-22 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 7:18 AM, Julius Davies wrote: > Hi, Niall, > > That's a nice Gaelic name you have there (my dad's name is Hywel Rhys). > > Thanks so much for RM'ing codec-1.4.  Here's some feedback for you! > > > Codec-1.4 will need the patches from CODEC-80 applied, since they fix > an ann

Re: [Codec] Codec 1.4 RC1 available for review

2009-07-22 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 4:10 AM, sebb wrote: > On 23/07/2009, Niall Pemberton wrote: >> I have prepared a release candidate for Codec 1.4 available here: >> >>  http://people.apache.org/~niallp/codec-1.4-rc1/ > > Sigs, hashes OK. > N&L files look OK > > It's a bit confusing to have Ant, M1 and M2

Re: [Codec] Codec 1.4 RC1 available for review

2009-07-22 Thread Julius Davies
ps. Regarding CODEC-80, the javadoc and inline comment for testChunkedEncodeMultipleOf76() is wrong. Sorry, I'm tired. On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 11:18 PM, Julius Davies wrote: > Hi, Niall, > > That's a nice Gaelic name you have there (my dad's name is Hywel Rhys). > > Thanks so much for RM'ing co

Re: [Codec] Codec 1.4 RC1 available for review

2009-07-22 Thread Julius Davies
Hi, Niall, That's a nice Gaelic name you have there (my dad's name is Hywel Rhys). Thanks so much for RM'ing codec-1.4. Here's some feedback for you! Codec-1.4 will need the patches from CODEC-80 applied, since they fix an annoying bug. I would also like to get a patch in for CODEC-59 (Add me

Re: [Codec] Codec 1.4 RC1 available for review

2009-07-22 Thread sebb
On 23/07/2009, Niall Pemberton wrote: > I have prepared a release candidate for Codec 1.4 available here: > > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/codec-1.4-rc1/ Sigs, hashes OK. N&L files look OK It's a bit confusing to have Ant, M1 and M2 build files present - are they all up to date? Builds and

[Codec] Codec 1.4 RC1 available for review

2009-07-22 Thread Niall Pemberton
I have prepared a release candidate for Codec 1.4 available here: http://people.apache.org/~niallp/codec-1.4-rc1/ Site is available here: http://people.apache.org/~niallp/codec-1.4-rc1/site/ (note: some links are relative and will be broken until deployed to proper codec home) RAT Report: http:/

Re: svn commit: r796927 - in /commons/proper/codec/tags/CODEC_1_4_RC1: ./ default.properties pom.xml project.xml src/site/site.xml xdocs/changes.xml xdocs/download_codec.xml

2009-07-22 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 3:20 AM, sebb wrote: > On 23/07/2009, nia...@apache.org wrote: >> Author: niallp >>  Date: Thu Jul 23 02:07:45 2009 >>  New Revision: 796927 >> >>  URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=796927&view=rev >>  Log: >>  Tag Codec 1.4 Release Candidate 1 >> > > Bit too soon: pom.

Re: svn commit: r796927 - in /commons/proper/codec/tags/CODEC_1_4_RC1: ./ default.properties pom.xml project.xml src/site/site.xml xdocs/changes.xml xdocs/download_codec.xml

2009-07-22 Thread sebb
On 23/07/2009, nia...@apache.org wrote: > Author: niallp > Date: Thu Jul 23 02:07:45 2009 > New Revision: 796927 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=796927&view=rev > Log: > Tag Codec 1.4 Release Candidate 1 > Bit too soon: pom.xml needs encoding type to avoid: [WARNING] Using platfor

Re: [codec] Release Manager for 1.4

2009-07-22 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 2:34 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > Hi All: > > Do we have a volunteer to act as release manager for Codec 1.4? I'll can try to do this. Niall > Gary - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.o

RE: Commons Dbutils: Request feedback for possible patch; handling nested beans.

2009-07-22 Thread Dan Fabulich
I share Liam's intuition that I don't think we need this. Now that you've written this processor for yourself, you can use it; it's easy to pass your own BeanProcessor to BasicRowProcessor, and you can always hand that BRP to any of our existing ResultSetHandlers. Trying to provide perfectly

Re: svn commit: r796172 [1/3] - in /commons/proper/codec/trunk: ./ src/java/org/apache/commons/codec/ src/java/org/apache/commons/codec/binary/ src/java/org/apache/commons/codec/net/ src/test/org/ap

2009-07-22 Thread Niall Pemberton
The RequiredCharsetNamesTest you added has a header with "Copyright (C) 1993-2003 SEAGULL" rather than the standard Apache License header. Niall On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 9:00 AM, wrote: > Author: ggregory > Date: Tue Jul 21 08:00:52 2009 > New Revision: 796172 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewv

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme (in module commons-jelly) failed

2009-07-22 Thread commons-jelly-tags-jaxme development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community integration

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-fmt-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2009-07-22 Thread commons-jelly-tags-fmt development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-fmt-test has an issue affecting its community integrat

RE: Commons Dbutils: Request feedback for possible patch; handling nested beans.

2009-07-22 Thread Philip, Anil - Kansas City, MO
My fix was to create a NestedBeanProcessor that inherited from BeanProcessor and accepts a mapping in the constructor. However, **in a patch, it would be better to simply modify the toBean() in BeanProcessor and add a constructor that accepts a Hashtable**. Current fix: 1) For each nested bean, u

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons-Net 1.5.0-RC4

2009-07-22 Thread James Carman
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 1:52 PM, sebb wrote: > Yes, it can go in the parent, but AFAIK the component pom will still > need to be changed to point to the new parent. Right. We'd have to make sure everyone is using the new parent (we always have to do that when we upgrade)

Re: Commons Dbutils: Request feedback for possible patch; handling nested beans.

2009-07-22 Thread Liam Coughlin
The default BeanHandler is not a full mapping solution and I'm not sure you really want it to be -- that's a case where it might be in your best interest to implement a custom Handler. Cheers -L On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Philip, Anil - Kansas City, MO < anil.phi...@kcc.usda.gov> wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons-Net 1.5.0-RC4

2009-07-22 Thread sebb
On 22/07/2009, James Carman wrote: > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 8:35 PM, sebb wrote: > > > > The POM needs to specify the encoding. > > > Perhaps we need to put this in the parent? Can we just use UTF-8 or > something? Yes, it can go in the parent, but AFAIK the component pom will still need to

Re: [all] files encoding (was Re: [VOTE] Release Commons-Net 1.5.0-RC4)

2009-07-22 Thread Ted Dunning
+1 On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Could we change the default for *all* types of text files including java > source files to UTF-8 ? > -- Ted Dunning, CTO DeepDyve

RE: Commons Dbutils: Request feedback for possible patch; handling nested beans.

2009-07-22 Thread Philip, Anil - Kansas City, MO
Here is the example - I had an idea and implemented a possible fix that works. I would like to know before I submit a patch, whether it really is a solution or if there is a better way. In short, can I get feedback here? Problem: Some of our beans contain object references to other b

[all] files encoding (was Re: [VOTE] Release Commons-Net 1.5.0-RC4)

2009-07-22 Thread Luc Maisonobe
James Carman a écrit : > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 8:35 PM, sebb wrote: >> The POM needs to specify the encoding. > > Perhaps we need to put this in the parent? Can we just use UTF-8 or > something? Allow me to jump here and ask a more general question. The default encoding in the parent pom is i

Re: DBCP deadlock. Is this bug DBCP-270?

2009-07-22 Thread Mark Thomas
Ying Chyn Ng wrote: > Hello. > > I encountered an issue that looks similar to Bug DBCP-270. > I wish to know: > 1) Is it the same bug or a new one? Don't know. Without the full stack traces for the locked threads it is impossible to tell. > 2) Which patch can I apply and how to apply it? That dep

DBCP deadlock. Is this bug DBCP-270?

2009-07-22 Thread Ying Chyn Ng
Hello. I encountered an issue that looks similar to Bug DBCP-270. I wish to know: 1) Is it the same bug or a new one? 2) Which patch can I apply and how to apply it? 3) Will setting testWhileIdle="false" avoid the problem? System info: Tomcat 6.0.18, CentOS 5.2 64-bit, MySQL Connector/J 5.1.17 (I

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme (in module commons-jelly) failed

2009-07-22 Thread commons-jelly-tags-jaxme development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community integration

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-fmt-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2009-07-22 Thread commons-jelly-tags-fmt development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-fmt-test has an issue affecting its community integrat

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons-Net 1.5.0-RC4

2009-07-22 Thread James Carman
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 8:35 PM, sebb wrote: > > The POM needs to specify the encoding. Perhaps we need to put this in the parent? Can we just use UTF-8 or something? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2009-07-22 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community integrati