Re: [VALIDATOR] Proposal for a JSR-303 Bean Validation Implementation

2009-09-08 Thread Donald Woods
Thanks for the input. I'd prefer to continue using the validator2 sandbox, so other Commons committers and users will be aware of the project and provide help/reviews when they can. -Donald Niall Pemberton wrote: On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 7:18 PM, Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org wrote:

[Commons Wiki] Update of TheSandbox by Donald Woods

2009-09-08 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Commons Wiki for change notification. The following page has been changed by Donald Woods: http://wiki.apache.org/commons/TheSandbox The comment on the change is: added Validator2

[Commons Wiki] Update of Betwixt/FrequentlyAskedQuestions by nrahimunisa

2009-09-08 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Commons Wiki for change notification. The following page has been changed by nrahimunisa: http://wiki.apache.org/commons/Betwixt/FrequentlyAskedQuestions

[Commons Wiki] Update of Betwixt/FrequentlyAskedQuestions by nrahimunisa

2009-09-08 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Commons Wiki for change notification. The following page has been changed by nrahimunisa: http://wiki.apache.org/commons/Betwixt/FrequentlyAskedQuestions

Re: [VALIDATOR] Proposal for a JSR-303 Bean Validation Implementation

2009-09-08 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Dinnour.moham...@gmail.com wrote: I support either solution 1 or 2 from first section of solutions: 1- We will not be waiting for others till they decide whether donate the code or not. RH donation will not happen - we could fork, the license

Re: [VALIDATOR] Proposal for a JSR-303 Bean Validation Implementation

2009-09-08 Thread Mohammad Nour El-Din
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 11:58 PM, Matthias Wessendorfmat...@apache.org wrote: On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Dinnour.moham...@gmail.com wrote: I support either solution 1 or 2 from first section of solutions: 1- We will not be waiting for others till they decide whether

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jexl (in module apache-commons) failed

2009-09-08 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jexl has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue