--
From: "Mladen Turk"
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 11:45 AM
To:
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Daemon 1.0.3 based on RC2
On 03/16/2010 07:17 PM, ebb wrote:
There's a problem with the Manifests in the source and javadoc jars.
They have:
Implem
--
From: "sebb"
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 11:46 AM
To: "Commons Developers List"
Subject: [DAEMON] Site documentation
The binaries page:
http://people.apache.org/~mturk/daemon/site/binaries.html
mentions FreeBSD, but the only provided imp
Hu, ZhangHao wrote:
> Hi All
>
>
>
> I am using commons-dbcp-1.2.2 + common-pools-1.5.2 and meet a dead-lock
> problem.
>
> The problem is if all connections in the thread pool are occupied, and
> other threads are waiting for db connection.
>
> Then if those threads received InterruptedExcep
The Commons-Build plugin pages
http://commons.apache.org/commons-build-plugin/index.html
do not appear to be linked from the main Commons site.
Perhaps it could be added to:
http://commons.apache.org/building.html ?
Any better suggestions?
-
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:52 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 17/03/2010, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> I'm -1 to polluting component builds with this.
>
> I'm only proposing it for Daemon, so the release can be made.
What the vendor id has in the manifest for javadocs and sources jars
is trivial. So IMO this
On 17/03/2010, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> I'm -1 to polluting component builds with this.
I'm only proposing it for Daemon, so the release can be made.
Once commons-parent is fixed, the temporary fix can be removed from Daemon.
> Niall
>
> 2010/3/16 :
>
> > Author: sebb
> > Date: Tue Mar 16 1
I'm -1 to polluting component builds with this.
Niall
2010/3/16 :
> Author: sebb
> Date: Tue Mar 16 19:35:12 2010
> New Revision: 923946
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=923946&view=rev
> Log:
> Temporary fix for Implementation-Vendor-Id
>
> Modified:
> commons/proper/daemon/trunk/po
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community
integrati
Commons-Parent defines
Implementation-Vendor-Id as org.apache
for the maven-jar-plugin.
However, this does not seem to be used when creating source:jar or javadoc:jar.
As far as I can tell, these rely on the "defaultImplementationEntries"
which include:
Implementation-Vendor-Id: ${pom.groupId}
The binaries page:
http://people.apache.org/~mturk/daemon/site/binaries.html
mentions FreeBSD, but the only provided implementations are linux,
darwin, solaris, windows.
Also, the naming convention is not as documented on the page.
It would help if the page explained the difference between
com
On 03/16/2010 07:17 PM, ebb wrote:
There's a problem with the Manifests in the source and javadoc jars.
They have:
Implementation-Vendor-Id: commons-daemon
but that should be:
Implementation-Vendor-Id: org.apache
This is really getting annoying.
I really don't wish to do another release
ju
On 16/03/2010, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 03/16/2010 05:22 PM, sebb wrote:
>
> >
> > The KEYS file is a bit old, but I assume it won't actually be used.
> >
> > Also, the source/ directory still has the 1.0.2 version in it, which
> > confused me a bit.
> >
> >
>
> This has nothing to do with a relea
On 03/16/2010 05:22 PM, sebb wrote:
-1
I think the packaging needs to be improved.
Ping. Have you read my comments?
Regards
--
^TM
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-m
On 03/16/2010 05:22 PM, sebb wrote:
The KEYS file is a bit old, but I assume it won't actually be used.
Also, the source/ directory still has the 1.0.2 version in it, which
confused me a bit.
This has nothing to do with a release.
It's a folder README. fixed anyhow
The source/ dir also ha
In 16/03/2010, Mladen Turk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Calling this again due to a typo and
> removing site and dormant subcomponents from the
> source distribution.
>
> We had 1.0.2 release last month and now 1.0.3 solves
> few minor bug fixes and adds couple of new features.
> Some of the old files n
Looks like Net is gearing up for a 2.1 release. There are a number of
changes which break compatibility with Net 2.0:
http://commons.apache.org/net/clirr-report.html
I tried to redeploy the site - but was only paritally successful
because of file permissions - Rory could you fix the permissions o
Hi,
Calling this again due to a typo and
removing site and dormant subcomponents from the
source distribution.
We had 1.0.2 release last month and now 1.0.3 solves
few minor bug fixes and adds couple of new features.
Some of the old files not having ASL license header
were updated, although some
Due to a typo in one of the site's files. The vote
has been canceled.
Regards
--
^TM
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
+1 from me
Niall
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:15 AM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to release version 8 of the commons-sandbox-parent pom.
>
> The following link shows the changes since the last release
>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/commons-sandbox-parent/trunk/pom.xm
The only *nit* was that the jsvc page was broken (I fixed it in trunk):
http://people.apache.org/~mturk/daemon/site/jsvc.html
but artifacts all look good so +1 from me
Niall
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Release early, release often :)
>
> We had 1.0.2 releas
+1
On 16/03/2010, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> +1
>
> Niall Pemberton wrote at Dienstag, 16. März 2010 01:15:
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to release version 8 of the commons-sandbox-parent pom.
> >
> > The following link shows the changes since the last release
> >
> > http://svn.apache.org/vi
Hi,
Release early, release often :)
We had 1.0.2 release last month and now 1.0.3 solves
few minor bug fixes and adds couple of new features.
Some of the old files not having ASL license header
were updated, although some machine generated are left intact.
The release is available for testing a
Hi All
I am using commons-dbcp-1.2.2 + common-pools-1.5.2 and meet a dead-lock
problem.
The problem is if all connections in the thread pool are occupied, and
other threads are waiting for db connection.
Then if those threads received InterruptedException, then the thread
pool will be dead an
+1
Niall Pemberton wrote at Dienstag, 16. März 2010 01:15:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to release version 8 of the commons-sandbox-parent pom.
>
> The following link shows the changes since the last release
>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/commons-sandbox-
parent/trunk/pom.xml?r1=678516&
24 matches
Mail list logo
