One other thought. It would definitely be worth discussing if the Log4j 2.0
API could eliminate the need for Commons Logging.
Ralph
On May 29, 2010, at 9:04 AM, Curt Arnold wrote:
> Apache log4j 2.0 has been a long simmering bunch of wish lists and a little
> experimental code waiting for a s
I believe vfs is OK (and overdue) for a 2.0 release. I started to do it but
after getting a key signed at ApacheCon in Oakland I managed to forget the
password. I need to create a new signing key for myself to be able to do it.
Then it is just a matter of finding the time and learning the pro
Apache log4j 2.0 has been a long simmering bunch of wish lists and a little
experimental code waiting for a sufficient community to assemble to start
fleshing things out. Not sure if we are there yet, but looks like there is
some signs of life and it would be good to have as many perspectives a
It has been a long time since the last release of [configuration], and
their have been numerous fixes in the mean time. So I think we really
ought to get out Configuration 1.7.
The dependency to [vfs] 2.0-SNAPSHOT is a blocker, so this would have to
be released first. What is the status here?
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-vfs-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This is
