On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 11:21 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Phil Steitz
> wrote:
> > On 3/13/11 10:28 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> >> On 13/03/2011 16:45, Phil Steitz wrote:
> >>> On Mar 13, 2011, at 1:24 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 12/03/2011 18:03, Phil Steitz
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 3/13/11 10:28 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 13/03/2011 16:45, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On Mar 13, 2011, at 1:24 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 12/03/2011 18:03, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 3/12/11 10:41 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 12/03/
Here's my +1 to both too.
On 14 March 2011 00:08, Phil Steitz wrote:
> +1 for both
>
> Thanks for doing this, Sebb!
No problem...
(though there were a few issues getting it all to work- I learnt quite
a lot about Maven in the process ...)
> Phil
> On 3/11/11 8:18 PM, sebb wrote:
>> Please may
+1 to both.
-Rahul
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:18 PM, sebb wrote:
> Please may I have your votes for Commons Skin 3 and Commons Parent 19?
>
> The two have to be tested together because Commons Skin 3 is
> referenced from Commons Parent 19.
>
> If the vote for Commons Skin fails, then Commons Par
+1 for both
Thanks for doing this, Sebb!
Phil
On 3/11/11 8:18 PM, sebb wrote:
> Please may I have your votes for Commons Skin 3 and Commons Parent 19?
>
> The two have to be tested together because Commons Skin 3 is
> referenced from Commons Parent 19.
>
> If the vote for Commons Skin fails, then
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 11:03 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 13 March 2011 00:23, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> OK +1 from me then.
>
> Is that +1 for Skin and +1 for Parent?
Yes, +1 to both
Niall
>> Niall
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 12:15 AM, Gary Gregory
>> wrote:
>>> I'd just like to press along to p
Thanks, Sebb!
Phil
On 3/13/11 6:58 AM, sebb wrote:
> Commons Daemon 1.0.5 was released some while ago, but nothing was
> released to Maven at the time.
>
> The Java portion of Commons Daemon 1.0.5 has now been released to Maven
> Central.
>
> To include it in your project, add the following to t
On 3/13/11 10:28 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 13/03/2011 16:45, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On Mar 13, 2011, at 1:24 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> On 12/03/2011 18:03, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 3/12/11 10:41 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 12/03/2011 15:52, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>> Please anyone else c
On 13/03/2011 16:45, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On Mar 13, 2011, at 1:24 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 12/03/2011 18:03, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 3/12/11 10:41 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 12/03/2011 15:52, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Please anyone else chime in with different opinions. I want to make
On Mar 13, 2011, at 1:24 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 12/03/2011 18:03, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 3/12/11 10:41 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> On 12/03/2011 15:52, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 3/12/11 8:45 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 12 March 2011 04:20, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> I thought we had agree
Commons Daemon 1.0.5 was released some while ago, but nothing was
released to Maven at the time.
The Java portion of Commons Daemon 1.0.5 has now been released to Maven Central.
To include it in your project, add the following to the POM>
commons-daemon
commons-daemon
1.0.5
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
On 13 March 2011 00:23, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> OK +1 from me then.
Is that +1 for Skin and +1 for Parent?
> Niall
>
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 12:15 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> I'd just like to press along to pick up the new vers of plugins. We
>> can fiddle the tm for the next go around.
>>
>>
Thanks to all who voted.
The voting is as follows:
Niall Pemberton +1
Phil Steitz +1
Sebastian Bazley +1
Simone Tripodi +1
All are binding.
There were no other votes.
There being at least 3 binding +1 votes (and no -1 votes) the vote passes.
I will release (promote the staging repo) the code
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-vfs2 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
On 12/03/2011 18:03, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 3/12/11 10:41 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 12/03/2011 15:52, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 3/12/11 8:45 AM, sebb wrote:
On 12 March 2011 04:20, Phil Steitz wrote:
> I thought we had agreed that we are not going to do this, i.e.,
> maintain that
17 matches
Mail list logo
