[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-math (in module apache-commons) failed

2011-03-14 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-math has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

Re: [VOTE][SITE]{RESULT] Release Commons Skin 3 and Commons Parent 19

2011-03-14 Thread Gary Gregory
Good stuff. Can you us know when the new version is available for us from Maven? Gary On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 11:41 PM, sebb wrote: > Thanks to all who voted. The voting was as follows: > > Commons Skin 3 based on RC3 > === > Gary Gregory +1 > Luc Maisonobe +1 > Niall Pembe

[VOTE][SITE]{RESULT] Release Commons Skin 3 and Commons Parent 19

2011-03-14 Thread sebb
Thanks to all who voted. The voting was as follows: Commons Skin 3 based on RC3 === Gary Gregory +1 Luc Maisonobe +1 Niall Pemberton +1 Phil Steitz +1 Rahul Akolkar +1 Sebastian Bazley +1 Simone Tripodi +1 Commons Parent 19 based on RC3 == Gary Gregory

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2011-03-14 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: Trademakrs and logos. WAS beanutils commit msg...

2011-03-14 Thread sebb
On 14 March 2011 03:21, Henri Yandell wrote: > On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: >> On 3/13/11 10:28 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: >>> On 13/03/2011 16:45, Phil Steitz wrote: On Mar 13, 2011, at 1:24 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 12/03/2011 18:03, Phil Steitz wrote: >> On

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-scxml-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2011-03-14 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-vfs2 (in module apache-commons) failed

2011-03-14 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-vfs2 has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

Re: [VOTE][SITE] Release Commons Skin 3 and Commons Parent 19

2011-03-14 Thread Simone Tripodi
+1 for both Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 1:59 AM, sebb wrote: > Here's my +1 to both too. > > On 14 March 2011 00:08, Phil Steitz wrote: >> +1 for both >> >> Thanks for doing this, Sebb! > > No problem... > > (though there were a

Re: Trademakrs and logos. WAS beanutils commit msg...

2011-03-14 Thread Mark Thomas
On 14/03/2011 03:21, Henri Yandell wrote: > It depends on component. > > We should always claim "Apache Commons XYZ". +1 > For a unique name, for example, Sanselan, we should state our claim of: > > "Apache Commons Sanselan" > "Commons Sanselan" > "Sanselan" +1 > For a non-unique name,

Re: Trademakrs and logos. WAS beanutils commit msg...

2011-03-14 Thread Mark Thomas
On 14/03/2011 04:00, Gary Gregory wrote: > Should all the logos include "Apache"? I'd double check with trademarks@ to be sure but I don't believe that is necessary. For example, the Apache Tomcat logo contains no text at all. Mark