There is the get simple class name API issue from another email today.
I am in transit and can't file a jira ATm.
Gary
On Apr 20, 2011, at 2:56, Henri Yandell wrote:
> I think we're ready for another release candidate.
>
> Does anyone know of any remaining items? JIRA is clean, and I don't
> se
Henri Yandell wrote:
> I think we're ready for another release candidate.
>
> Does anyone know of any remaining items? JIRA is clean, and I don't
> see anything in the email threads that implies more work needs to be
> done.
It's about time ;-)
- Jörg
-
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:10 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Is Pair now good (for a value of consensually agreed good)?
Good enough, although Stephen noted in ImmutablePair's javadoc that
being non-final, a subclass could add
undesirable/counter-to-expectation behavior. I can't see any reason
why we
Many applications rely on a single class-loader.
Not all applications can easily be changed to use multiple
classloaders, and anyway I don't think Commons should force end-users
to use multiple class-loaders to fix compatibility issues.
Since a single class loader can only load a single instance
On 20 April 2011 18:24, Matt Benson wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:10 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> Is Pair now good (for a value of consensually agreed good)?
>
> Good enough, although Stephen noted in ImmutablePair's javadoc that
> being non-final, a subclass could add
> undesirable/counter-t
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:10 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> > Is Pair now good (for a value of consensually agreed good)?
>
> Good enough, although Stephen noted in ImmutablePair's javadoc that
> being non-final, a subclass could add
> undesirabl
Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:10 AM, Henri Yandell
>> wrote:
>> > Is Pair now good (for a value of consensually agreed good)?
>>
>> Good enough, although Stephen noted in ImmutablePair's javadoc that
>> being non-final,
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Matt Benson
> wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:10 AM, Henri Yandell
> >> wrote:
> >> > Is Pair now good (for a value of consensually agreed good)?
> >>
> >> Good enough, al
Hi all guys,
any objection if I provide help on fixing checkstyle/findbugs/compiler warnings?
Thanks in advance,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commo
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>
>> Gary Gregory wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Matt Benson
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:10 AM, Henri Yandell
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > Is Pair now good (fo
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>>
>>> Gary Gregory wrote:
>>>
>>> > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Matt Benson
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:
Fire away I say.
G
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> any objection if I provide help on fixing checkstyle/findbugs/compiler
> warnings?
> Thanks in advance,
> Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
>
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Jörg Schaible >wrote:
> >
> >> Gary Gregory wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Matt Benson
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Wed, Apr 2
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Gary Gregory
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Jörg Schaible > >wrote:
>> >
>> >> Gary Gregory wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
Le 20/04/2011 22:49, Simone Tripodi a écrit :
Hi all guys,
any objection if I provide help on fixing checkstyle/findbugs/compiler warnings?
Thank you for helping, but please don't rush, CLI is a very subtle beast
that gets easily broken by an apparently innocent change.
Emmanuel Bourg
smi
Bonjour Emmanuel!
don't worry, since I need to better understand CLI internal code, I
just would like to fix minor-minor warnings such Generics, missing
@Override/@Deprecated annotations, final fields where possible, etc
I don't intend modify the CLI code/behavior at all, once I'll feel
more famili
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
Hi Hen,
Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
[snip]
>
> PairFormat class needed rather than relying on toString functionality :)
>
> Could we implement Formattable?
+1
Something new learned today :)
- Jörg
19 matches
Mail list logo