2011/12/21 sebb seb...@gmail.com:
On 21 December 2011 12:14, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 21, 2011, at 7:12, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
I slightly prefer Imaging to Image as well.
Could also call it JIL - Java Imaging Library - by analogy with JCS and JCI.
Commons
On 19/12/2011 14:54, Gary Gregory wrote:
This is a VOTE to [ALL] to rename Commons Sanselan to Commons Image.
The drive is to have a meaningful obvious name like [Lang], [IO], [Net],
and so on.
This VOTE is open until December 22, 10AM EST.
-1.
The naming decision was made by the
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 19/12/2011 14:54, Gary Gregory wrote:
This is a VOTE to [ALL] to rename Commons Sanselan to Commons Image.
The drive is to have a meaningful obvious name like [Lang], [IO], [Net],
and so on.
This VOTE is open until
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 19/12/2011 14:54, Gary Gregory wrote:
This is a VOTE to [ALL] to rename Commons Sanselan to Commons Image.
The drive is to have a
-0
I think project names are ASF property (like a trademark). Without
clarification from the board or legal, the vote seems premature.
On Dec 22, 2011 5:32 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 19/12/2011 14:54, Gary Gregory wrote:
This is a VOTE to [ALL] to rename Commons Sanselan to
On 22/12/2011 13:00, Paul Benedict wrote:
-0
I think project names are ASF property (like a trademark). Without
clarification from the board or legal, the vote seems premature.
Projects are free to change the name of a component whenever they like.
Changing the name of a TLP requires board
Hi Mark,
Mark Thomas wrote:
On 22/12/2011 13:00, Paul Benedict wrote:
-0
I think project names are ASF property (like a trademark). Without
clarification from the board or legal, the vote seems premature.
Projects are free to change the name of a component whenever they like.
Changing
Hello,
I am no native english speaker, but it seems to me that
commons-imaging would suggest image analysis tools, while (as far as I
know) sanselan is devoted to IO. In which case, maybe commons-imageio
would be better suited?
Sébastien
Hi All,
I am new to this mailing list and the development of the apache commons, but I
have just been going through the code of Math package, and couldn't find any
code that would be meant to do primality test. Could you tell me if there is
anyone else working on this right now or maybe there
Hi,
I highly appreciated the last contributions (thanks guys!) but I also
agree on this point, so let's start from the end.
I think that, no matter what underlying structure we come up with, the
user should be able to specify e.g. a weighted edge with something like
public class MyEdge
On 2011-12-21, Mark Thomas wrote:
The Tomcat project is cleaning up Gump and removing old, unsupported
Tomcat versions (that also probably have security vulnerabilities).
JCS currently has an optional dependency on jakarta-tomcat (Tomcat
3.3.x). Since I will be removing jakarta-tomcat from
On Dec 22, 2011 8:39 AM, Claudio Squarcella squar...@dia.uniroma3.it
wrote:
Hi,
I highly appreciated the last contributions (thanks guys!) but I also
agree on this point, so let's start from the end.
I think that, no matter what underlying structure we come up with, the
user should be able
Hi James,
welcome in [graph] :)
DirectGraph is a DataStructure, Dijkstra is an algorithm and would be
better in therms of design keeping algorithms implementation separated
from DS.
Moreover, DirectGraph is an interface - users can provide their own
implementations - so no way to provide
Hi,
Just thought I'd throw something out here. My experience is that I often
take the same graph (as in the exact same data, same objects) but at
different times want to use different weights. So, rather than having Edge
extend WeightedW, I'd factor weights out into their own interface:
/**
*
The obvious fix here is to synchronize all methods that read or
write instanceMap. That would include getObjectInstance, which
makes me worry a little about performance impacts. I am not a JNDI
expert and I get dizzy when I try to trace how tomcat actually
creates and manages datasource
On 12/22/11 7:20 AM, Pyniak, Karol wrote:
Hi All,
I am new to this mailing list and the development of the apache commons, but
I have just been going through the code of Math package, and couldn't find
any code that would be meant to do primality test. Could you tell me if there
is anyone
Hi Phil,
Many thanks for the quick reply, and if there is no one else currently working
on this, I will be more than happy to get to know the convention used in the
Math package and add some number theory to the package.
Thanks,
Karol.
Od:
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-sanselan-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
I'd be interested in reviewing any number theory additions to [math]. It
seems that the project has grown enough that it can branch out into number
theory as well.
-Original Message-
From: Pyniak, Karol
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 5:07 PM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject:
Now we have destroyByBorrowValidationCount and
destroyByEvictorCount. The latter includes both idle timeouts and
validation failures when testWhileIdle is true. And we have no
count of destroys due to validation failure on return with
testOnReturn true. I wonder if it would be better to just
These counts only count threads waiting on the Deques. We don't
track factory methods in progress other than creates; but it looks
to me like the estimate could be made more accurate by adding (in
GOP case) createCount - createdCount. This is probably not that
important in practice, unless the
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
22 matches
Mail list logo
