Re: Bug in "RandomDataTest" ?

2012-01-29 Thread Sébastien Brisard
Hi Gilles, > > My worry is that the test fails for many choices of seeds. And I don't know > how to figure out whether the unit test is wrong, or the code is wrong, or > it is normal that the choice of seed has such an influence on the test (in > which case it should be documented that not all seed

Re: Bug in "RandomDataTest" ?

2012-01-29 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 29/01/2012 09:41, Sébastien Brisard a écrit : > Hi Gilles, >> >> My worry is that the test fails for many choices of seeds. And I don't know >> how to figure out whether the unit test is wrong, or the code is wrong, or >> it is normal that the choice of seed has such an influence on the test (in

Re: [SANDBOX][BeanUtils2] Thoughts about AccessibleObjectsRegistry

2012-01-29 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Benedikt, > I think the advantage is, that we need less local variables and that we can > read through the method(s) from > an abstract point, going deeper and deeper. > Every method should only be concerned with, well one concern > ;) and that > concern should be doing thinks on only one le

Re: [SANDBOX][BeanUtils2] Thoughts about AccessibleObjectsRegistry

2012-01-29 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hi Simo, thank you so much for your feedback! Have a look at my comments inline... Am 29.01.2012 11:30, schrieb Simone Tripodi: Hi Benedikt, I think the advantage is, that we need less local variables and that we can read through the method(s) from> an abstract point, going deeper and deepe

[VOTE] Release Apache Commons 1.4.0 based on RC2

2012-01-29 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all again mates :) after the failing RC1, I open the VOTE for Apache Commons validator 1.4.0 based on RC2. Follow details: Tag:     https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/validator/tags/VALIDATOR_1_4_0_RC2/ Release notes:    http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/validator/1.4.0/R

Re: [math] Feedback needed on MATH-735

2012-01-29 Thread Sébastien Brisard
Hi again, > > Dear all, > I know it's not the time to open new issues, but this one should be > quickly solved (I promise!), and I think it would really improve the > whole framework for iterative linear solvers. Anyway, please have a > look to what I've written. Also, I really need  some feedback

Re: [Math] Proposal for a set of interoperable interfaces for mathematical structures

2012-01-29 Thread Heinz Kredel
Am Mittwoch 25 Januar 2012, 19:13:25 schrieb Axel: > To extend JAS with the commons-math methods the easiest way is to extend > the > edu.jas.structure.AbelianGroupElem like this: > > public interface AbelianGroupElem> > extends Element, FieldElement > > and add the methods: > add() and

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons 1.4.0 based on RC2

2012-01-29 Thread sebb
On 29 January 2012 12:15, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi all again mates :) Wrong subject ... > after the failing RC1, I open the VOTE for Apache Commons validator > 1.4.0 based on RC2. Follow details: > > Tag: > >     > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/validator/tags/VALIDATOR_1_4_0_

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons 1.4.0 based on RC2

2012-01-29 Thread Simone Tripodi
ouch :S http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 2:56 PM, sebb wrote: > On 29 January 2012 12:15, Simone Tripodi wrote: >> Hi all again mates :) > > Wrong subject ... > >> aft

[VOTE] Release Apache Commons Validator 1.4.0 Based on RC

2012-01-29 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all again mates :) after the failing RC1, I open the VOTE for Apache Commons validator 1.4.0 based on RC2. Follow details: Tag:     https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/validator/tags/VALIDATOR_1_4_0_RC2/ Release notes:    http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/validator/1.4.0/R

[IGNORE][VOTE] Release Apache Commons 1.4.0 based on RC2

2012-01-29 Thread Simone Tripodi
hi all, due to wrong subject, please ignore this VOTE thread. Thanks you! -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi all again mates :)

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Validator 1.4.0 Based on RC

2012-01-29 Thread Oliver Heger
+1 Looks good now, my concerns have been addressed. The only minor nit I found is that the ant build is not able to execute the tests. It fails with test.main: [echo] Running main tests ... [java] Class not found "org.apache.commons.validator.ValidatorTestSuite" But this is not blo

Re: Bug in "RandomDataTest" ?

2012-01-29 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hello. > >> My worry is that the test fails for many choices of seeds. And I don't know > >> how to figure out whether the unit test is wrong, or the code is wrong, or > >> it is normal that the choice of seed has such an influence on the test (in > >> which case it should be documented that not a

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-digester3 (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-01-29 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration. This i

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-exec-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-01-29 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This i

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-01-29 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This