Hi Gilles,
>
> My worry is that the test fails for many choices of seeds. And I don't know
> how to figure out whether the unit test is wrong, or the code is wrong, or
> it is normal that the choice of seed has such an influence on the test (in
> which case it should be documented that not all seed
Le 29/01/2012 09:41, Sébastien Brisard a écrit :
> Hi Gilles,
>>
>> My worry is that the test fails for many choices of seeds. And I don't know
>> how to figure out whether the unit test is wrong, or the code is wrong, or
>> it is normal that the choice of seed has such an influence on the test (in
Hi Benedikt,
> I think the advantage is, that we need less local variables and that we can
> read through the method(s) from > an abstract point, going deeper and deeper.
> Every method should only be concerned with, well one concern > ;) and that
> concern should be doing thinks on only one le
Hi Simo,
thank you so much for your feedback! Have a look at my comments inline...
Am 29.01.2012 11:30, schrieb Simone Tripodi:
Hi Benedikt,
I think the advantage is, that we need less local variables and that we can read
through the method(s) from> an abstract point, going deeper and deepe
Hi all again mates :)
after the failing RC1, I open the VOTE for Apache Commons validator
1.4.0 based on RC2. Follow details:
Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/validator/tags/VALIDATOR_1_4_0_RC2/
Release notes:
http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/validator/1.4.0/R
Hi again,
>
> Dear all,
> I know it's not the time to open new issues, but this one should be
> quickly solved (I promise!), and I think it would really improve the
> whole framework for iterative linear solvers. Anyway, please have a
> look to what I've written. Also, I really need some feedback
Am Mittwoch 25 Januar 2012, 19:13:25 schrieb Axel:
> To extend JAS with the commons-math methods the easiest way is to extend
> the
> edu.jas.structure.AbelianGroupElem like this:
>
> public interface AbelianGroupElem>
> extends Element, FieldElement
>
> and add the methods:
> add() and
On 29 January 2012 12:15, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all again mates :)
Wrong subject ...
> after the failing RC1, I open the VOTE for Apache Commons validator
> 1.4.0 based on RC2. Follow details:
>
> Tag:
>
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/validator/tags/VALIDATOR_1_4_0_
ouch :S
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 2:56 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 29 January 2012 12:15, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>> Hi all again mates :)
>
> Wrong subject ...
>
>> aft
Hi all again mates :)
after the failing RC1, I open the VOTE for Apache Commons validator
1.4.0 based on RC2. Follow details:
Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/validator/tags/VALIDATOR_1_4_0_RC2/
Release notes:
http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/validator/1.4.0/R
hi all,
due to wrong subject, please ignore this VOTE thread.
Thanks you!
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi all again mates :)
+1
Looks good now, my concerns have been addressed. The only minor nit I
found is that the ant build is not able to execute the tests. It fails with
test.main:
[echo] Running main tests ...
[java] Class not found
"org.apache.commons.validator.ValidatorTestSuite"
But this is not blo
Hello.
> >> My worry is that the test fails for many choices of seeds. And I don't know
> >> how to figure out whether the unit test is wrong, or the code is wrong, or
> >> it is normal that the choice of seed has such an influence on the test (in
> >> which case it should be documented that not a
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
16 matches
Mail list logo