On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Marco Speranza marcospera...@apache.orgwrote:
In the old BFS implementation, the discoverEdge method in the visitor
was even called for nodes that have been already visited, which is not
the case anymore. From my understanding the new behavior is correct, or
Hi +,
I can report the same test failure:
Failed tests:
findMaxFlowAndVerify(org.apache.commons.graph.flow.EdmondsKarpTestCase):
expected:3 but was:5
I just applied trivial modifications without altering the algorithms
behavior, I am sure the fix is under our eyes :)
Thanks all, have a nice
But I would like to discuss the visitor behavior in general, as I was
working on a SCC algorithm (Kosaraju), and found it quite difficult to
implement the recursive traversal using the visitor.
yep, yesterday night I was trying to implementing Kosaraju algo and I found the
same difficulties.
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=19541projectId=97
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Thu 1 Mar 2012 12:21:37 +
Finished at: Thu 1 Mar 2012 12:29:34 +
Total time: 7m 57s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build
This failure is due to the trunk version being set to 3.0, without the
SNAPSHOT suffix.
Trunk should not be left in non-SNAPSHOT state for any longer than is necessary
[Unless you use the release plugin, it's not necessary at all]
On 1 March 2012 12:29, Continuum@vmbuild contin...@apache.org
On 1 March 2012 12:19, er...@apache.org wrote:
Author: erans
Date: Thu Mar 1 12:19:30 2012
New Revision: 1295533
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1295533view=rev
Log:
Removed files not to be included in CM 3.0.
Removed:
Hello.
The version upgrade of the FindBugs plugin led to new discoveries some of
which are potentially serious bugs:
* org.apache.commons.math3.ode.nonstiff.GraggBulirschStoerIntegrator: Was
method setStepsizeControl (note the spelling) intended to override
setStepSizeControl defined
AccessibleObjectRegistry.AccessibleObjectDescriptor is used internally
only, users don't even know that it exist and it is used only as a key
for the AccessibleObject index.
Does it make sense checking other types, nulls, assignability from
super/subclasses, ... etc?
On 1 March 2012 13:12, Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org wrote:
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 12:49:56PM +, sebb wrote:
On 1 March 2012 12:19, er...@apache.org wrote:
Author: erans
Date: Thu Mar 1 12:19:30 2012
New Revision: 1295533
URL:
The only thing we have to add is
if ( !( obj instanceof AccessibleObjectDescriptor ) )
{
return false;
}
That will make AccessibleObjectDescritpor.equals() obey to the general
contract of equals (which states, that x.equals(null) has to return
false) and it will fix the FindBugs issue,
On 1 March 2012 14:01, Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org wrote:
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 02:46:33AM +, sebb wrote:
On 29 February 2012 23:04, Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org
wrote:
Hi.
Trying the following command (from the wiki UsingNexus page):
$ mvn
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 02:58:58PM +, sebb wrote:
On 1 March 2012 13:12, Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org wrote:
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 12:49:56PM +, sebb wrote:
On 1 March 2012 12:19, er...@apache.org wrote:
Author: erans
Date: Thu Mar 1 12:19:30 2012
New
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 03:09:41PM +, sebb wrote:
On 1 March 2012 14:01, Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org wrote:
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 02:46:33AM +, sebb wrote:
On 29 February 2012 23:04, Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org
wrote:
Hi.
Trying the
Hi Gilles,
* org.apache.commons.math3.linear.SymmLQ: Yet another problem with a
probably unnecessary Serializable...
In fact, it comes from a nested class which extends EventObject, so it
must be (unfortunately) serializable. I'll look into it.
Sébastien
if ( !( obj instanceof AccessibleObjectDescriptor ) )
{
return false;
}
what is the sense? having a situation where AccessibleObjectDescriptor
is compared to a different type object is something that can simply
*never* happen!
AccessibleObjectDescriptor is a *private static* class of the
FYI, I am also updating the examples in the /apps folder.
-Elijah
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Elijah,
no needs to learn docbook, the docbook page you see on svn repo is a
donation from an old book. Deployed documentation is generated
Hi Elijah,
this is something needed indeed, thanks *a lot*!!!
I don't know if you checked out updates, I switched to multi-module
project structure, looks like it is complete and I just have to add
the /apps in the modules list.
Thanks for the hard work, all the best!
-Simo
Hi Simo,
I don't know, why are reacting that harshly. I think that questioning
why an internal class does not have to obey to the general contract of
equals() is not a sign of lacking spirit of criticism.
I think adding that check or suppressing a FindBugs complain are both
equally valid
Hi.
* org.apache.commons.math3.linear.SymmLQ: Yet another problem with a
probably unnecessary Serializable...
In fact, it comes from a nested class which extends EventObject, so it
must be (unfortunately) serializable. I'll look into it.
Then, it seems that you can define it as
On 03/01/2012 09:10 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
Hi +,
I can report the same test failure:
Failed tests:
findMaxFlowAndVerify(org.apache.commons.graph.flow.EdmondsKarpTestCase):
expected:3 but was:5
I just applied trivial modifications without altering the algorithms
behavior, I am sure
Hi Thomas,
I run the test and it seems that the BSF explore twice the same edge.
Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.025 sec
FAILURE!
Results :
Tests in error:
verifyBreadthFirstSearch(org.apache.commons.graph.visit.VisitTestCase): Edge
x - y() is
On 03/01/2012 07:06 PM, Marco Speranza wrote:
Hi Thomas,
I run the test and it seems that the BSF explore twice the same edge.
Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.025 sec
FAILURE!
Results :
Tests in error:
Ok great! now works
thanks you!
--
Marco Speranza marcospera...@apache.org
Google Code: http://code.google.com/u/marco.speranza79/
Il giorno 01/mar/2012, alle ore 19:32, Thomas Neidhart ha scritto:
On 03/01/2012 07:06 PM, Marco Speranza wrote:
Hi Thomas,
I run the test and it seems that
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=19556projectId=251
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous Build: No previous build.
Started at: Thu 1 Mar 2012 19:10:22 +
Finished at: Thu 1 Mar 2012 19:11:00 +
Total time: 37s
Build Trigger:
On 2012-02-29 22:25, sebb wrote:
On 29 February 2012 21:14, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote:
Hi
Can someone please grant me karma @ http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum
I'd like to add some missing modules.
My account in Continuum is dennisl which is backed by my ASF e-mail
On 2012-03-01 06:23, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote:
On 2012-02-29 19:00, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
Hi
As we near the 1.0 release of Sanselan / Apache Commons Imaging, I am
having showstopper problems with Maven.
The first
YEAH congrats and thank you! :)
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 6:39 PM, t...@apache.org wrote:
Author: tn
Date: Thu Mar 1 17:39:59 2012
New Revision:
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote:
On 2012-03-01 06:23, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org
wrote:
On 2012-02-29 19:00, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
Hi
As we near the 1.0 release of Sanselan /
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote:
On 2012-03-01 06:23, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org
wrote:
On 2012-02-29 19:00, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
Hi
As we near the 1.0 release of Sanselan /
terrific, indeed!!!
very well done!
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Marco Speranza marcospera...@apache.org wrote:
Ok great! now works
thanks you!
--
Hi Bene,
apologize but maybe I expressed myself in the wrong form - I didn't
intend to offend you nor attack at all.
Sorry you got it personally.
My intention was rather spur you on not accepting rules/guides as they
are. I didn't hide you that IMHO you're a very talented guy - at your
age I
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote:
On 2012-03-01 06:23, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote:
On 2012-02-29 19:00, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
Hi
As we near the 1.0 release of Sanselan / Apache
On 2012-03-01 20:45, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote:
On 2012-03-01 06:23, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org
wrote:
On 2012-02-29 19:00, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
Hi
As we
Hi,
I have checked in my version of Kosaraju's strongly connected components
algorithm. It is a first version and I would be glad if someone can do a
review.
The implementation is roughly based on
http://algowiki.net/wiki/index.php?title=Kosaraju%27s_algorithm
but the search has been
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote:
On 2012-03-01 20:45, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org
wrote:
On 2012-03-01 06:23, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Dennis Lundberg
Le 01/03/2012 15:16, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
Hi.
Hi Gilles,
The version upgrade of the FindBugs plugin led to new discoveries some of
which are potentially serious bugs:
* org.apache.commons.math3.ode.nonstiff.GraggBulirschStoerIntegrator: Was
method setStepsizeControl (note the
:O WOW!
may I can ask you to mark SANDBOX-353 as resolved, please?
Many thanks in advance!
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 9:27 PM, t...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
the version of DatabaseConfiguration in the experimental branch strongly
differs from the trunk version. It uses a template approach for
executing JDBC operations thus avoiding the complex JDBC exception
handling plumbing code.
I prefer this style because IMHO it makes the
great work :-)
--
Marco Speranza marcospera...@apache.org
Google Code: http://code.google.com/u/marco.speranza79/
Il giorno 01/mar/2012, alle ore 21:26, Thomas Neidhart ha scritto:
Hi,
I have checked in my version of Kosaraju's strongly connected components
algorithm. It is a first version
Am 01.03.2012 20:52, schrieb Simone Tripodi:
Hi Bene,
apologize but maybe I expressed myself in the wrong form - I didn't
intend to offend you nor attack at all.
Sorry you got it personally.
you're right, I got that wrong - sorry (it's a bit ironic, since in my
last mail I told you not to
On 2012-02-29 19:00, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
Hi
As we near the 1.0 release of Sanselan / Apache Commons Imaging, I am
having showstopper problems with Maven.
The first problem, now fixed, was that mvn assembly:assembly failed
due to the Maven Assembly plugin failing to add a non-ASCII
Hi,
Added an extra check to prevent
discovering multiple edges that lead to the same (already visited) vertex.
cool stuff, thanks for turning human words into computer words :)
I spent a couple minutes running the tests on max-flow algos with
breakpoints and stuff, and apparently they keep
Ciao Marco,
+DirectedMutableWeightedGraphBaseLabeledVertex,
BaseLabeledWeightedEdgeInteger, Integer graph =
+newDirectedMutableWeightedGraph( new
AbstractGraphConnectionBaseLabeledVertex,
BaseLabeledWeightedEdgeInteger()
+{
+@Override
+
Hello Sébastien.
* org.apache.commons.math3.linear.SymmLQ: Yet another problem with a
probably unnecessary Serializable...
In fact, it comes from a nested class which extends EventObject, so it
must be (unfortunately) serializable. I'll look into it.
Then, it seems that you
Hello Luc.
The version upgrade of the FindBugs plugin led to new discoveries some of
which are potentially serious bugs:
* org.apache.commons.math3.ode.nonstiff.GraggBulirschStoerIntegrator: Was
method setStepsizeControl (note the spelling) intended to override
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=19566projectId=75
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Thu 1 Mar 2012 23:22:08 +
Finished at: Thu 1 Mar 2012 23:23:17 +
Total time: 1m 9s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Hi.
I'm now trying to figure how to stage the site. [What does stage mean in
this context?]
Reading this
---CUT---
server
idstagingSite/id
usernamerepouser/username
!-- other optional elements:
passwordmy_login_password/password
privateKey/path/to/identity/privateKey (default is
Hi.
I managed to complete part of the release process:
Tag on SVN:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_3_0_RC1/
Artefacts on Nexus:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-010/
I'm still stuck with the staged web site (cf. other post);
On Mar 1, 2012, at 7:59 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
Hi.
I managed to complete part of the release process:
Tag on SVN:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_3_0_RC1/
Artefacts on Nexus:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-010/
Sorry if this was double-posted. I think I accidentally sent it from
my personal email account too (which isn't subscribed).
Anyway, shouldn't we just let anything (perhaps restrict it to
Serializables) be a vertex or an edge?
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-lang3-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 11:37 PM, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote:
On 2012-02-29 19:00, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
Hi
As we near the 1.0 release of Sanselan / Apache Commons Imaging, I am
having showstopper problems with Maven.
The first problem, now fixed, was that mvn
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
Hello Sébastien.
Hi Gilles,
* org.apache.commons.math3.linear.SymmLQ: Yet another problem with a
probably unnecessary Serializable...
In fact, it comes from a nested class which extends EventObject, so it
must be (unfortunately) serializable. I'll look into it.
Then, it
Hi Simo,
I saw the changes and they look great! Let's see if I can get you a patch
to get the 2.0 apps examples compiling. They are written to use Java 1.3
and we need to change the pom to support 1.5. I already have some source
changes for them, but I am not done with it.
-Elijah
On Thu, Mar
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community
Hi James!
the email was posted twice because looks like you posted to old
jakarta address :P
The main reason because these interfaces are there, is that when I
started resurrecting it I just opened my Graph book, I started
defining element according to definitions :P
Some already implemented
True, the weighted stuff might require an interface, but you could
have a regular graph with arbitrary objects representing its edges
and vertices.
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 2:35 AM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi James,
while it could be true for Vertex, Edge in some case
Yeah, I would say something like this:
public interface GraphV extends Serializable,E extends Serializable
{
...
}
this is assuming you'd want to enforce the serialization stuff.
Otherwise it'd just be GraphV,E
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 2:47 AM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi
Hi Elijah,
great! :) You can take in consideration to include samples in the
maven reactor, so you can safety inherit the chain2 parent pom and
avoiding repeat stuff, have a look at existing thin pom modules :P
Samples will be anyway excluded from the deployment on Nexus, the
`dist` module
62 matches
Mail list logo
