[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-id (in module commons-sandbox) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-id has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-scxml-test (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jmx (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-jmx has an issue affecting its community integration.

Re: [Math] Serializable (again)

Le 07/05/2012 22:16, Gilles Sadowski a écrit : Hi. Hi Gilles, There is another complaint about some class not being Serializable: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-787 I don't want to argue all over again. We should probably add a section in the user guide stating the

Re: [Math] Serializable (again)

On 8 May 2012 10:26, Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr wrote: Le 07/05/2012 22:16, Gilles Sadowski a écrit : Hi. Hi Gilles, There is another complaint about some class not being Serializable:   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-787 I don't want to argue all over again. We

Re: [Math] Serializable (again)

Hello. There is another complaint about some class not being Serializable:   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-787 I don't want to argue all over again. We should probably add a section in the user guide stating the policy with regards to this issue. The problem is that

Re: [Math] Serializable (again)

On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org wrote: I am in favor of this second option: add Serializable were needed upon request. +1 +1 In this case, the request seems fair as the class is mainly a simple container for two values. But

Re: [Math] Serializable (again)

Hello, 2012/5/8 Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com: On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org wrote: I am in favor of this second option: add Serializable were needed upon request. +1 +1 In this case, the request seems fair as the

Re: [Math] Serializable (again)

On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 12:51:28PM +0200, Thomas Neidhart wrote: On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org wrote: I am in favor of this second option: add Serializable were needed upon request. +1 +1 In this case, the request seems

Re: [Math] Serializable (again)

On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 01:22:38PM +0200, Sébastien Brisard wrote: Hello, 2012/5/8 Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com: On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org wrote: I am in favor of this second option: add Serializable were needed upon

[math] Exposing the Lanczos approximation in o.a.c.m3.special.Gamma?

Hi, I've spent quite some time on MATH-753 [1], and I think I now have a satisfactory solution. The problem was to overcome the overflows which arise when computing the density of the Gamma distribution for large values of the argument and/or the scale parameter. As I initially feared, what was

Re: [Math] Serializable (again)

On 05/08/2012 01:44 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: Sorry to correct you: It was removed because it was not implemented properly. As a matter of principle, it is better to not support something rather to give a false sense of what can be done with the code. I do not want to start a heated

Re: [Math] Serializable (again)

I don't know that you want to get into supporting long-term serialization support. I would say CM should support transient serialization (if that makes any sense), such as marshalling/unmarshalling. If you guarantee long-term serialization support (reading data from serialized for much later,

Re: [math] Exposing the Lanczos approximation in o.a.c.m3.special.Gamma?

On 05/08/2012 05:26 PM, Sébastien Brisard wrote: Hi, I've spent quite some time on MATH-753 [1], and I think I now have a satisfactory solution. The problem was to overcome the overflows which arise when computing the density of the Gamma distribution for large values of the argument and/or

Re: [Math] Serializable (again)

On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 08:43:53PM +0200, Thomas Neidhart wrote: On 05/08/2012 01:44 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: Sorry to correct you: It was removed because it was not implemented properly. As a matter of principle, it is better to not support something rather to give a false sense of

Re: [Math] Serializable (again)

On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 02:55:47PM -0400, James Carman wrote: I don't know that you want to get into supporting long-term serialization support. I would say CM should support transient serialization (if that makes any sense), such as marshalling/unmarshalling. If you guarantee long-term

Re: [math] Exposing the Lanczos approximation in o.a.c.m3.special.Gamma?

I've spent quite some time on MATH-753 [1], and I think I now have a satisfactory solution. The problem was to overcome the overflows which arise when computing the density of the Gamma distribution for large values of the argument and/or the scale parameter. As I initially feared,

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-exec-test (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-digester3 (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-graph (in module commons-sandbox) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-graph has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: [math] Exposing the Lanczos approximation in o.a.c.m3.special.Gamma?

Hi Thomas, 2012/5/8 Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com: On 05/08/2012 05:26 PM, Sébastien Brisard wrote: Hi, I've spent quite some time on MATH-753 [1], and I think I now have a satisfactory solution. The problem was to overcome the overflows which arise when computing the density of

Re: [math] Exposing the Lanczos approximation in o.a.c.m3.special.Gamma?

Hi Gilles, 2012/5/8 Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org: I've spent quite some time on MATH-753 [1], and I think I now have a satisfactory solution. The problem was to overcome the overflows which arise when computing the density of the Gamma distribution for large values of the

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: [math] Exposing the Lanczos approximation in o.a.c.m3.special.Gamma?

Hi, the patch for the proposed modification has been attached to the MATH-753 ticket. Thanks for your comments! Best regards, Sébastien - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands,