I have no idea why it worked in 1.0 and fails now. As far as I can tell the
call to createManager has always been there. I have no idea why.
But I also don't know why
> Caused by: java.lang.ClassCastException:
> org.apache.commons.vfs2.provider.local.DefaultLocalFileProvider cannot be
> cast to
+1
just found .asc.(md5|sha1) files on repo that can be dropped
all the best and confrats once again for the hard work!
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 9:36 PM,
Hello.
> > [...]
The following:
> >> > I should be able to do all combinations, i.e.:
> >> > 1. Compile with javac 1.6 and run with java 1.6
> >> > 2. Compile with javac 1.7 and run with java 1.7
is achieved by those respective commands:
$ JAVA_1_6_HOME=/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun mvn -X -Pjava
Hi All:
When I run under our OSGi (Eclipse Equinox) set up with 2.0, I get this
pickle:
org.apache.commons.vfs2.FileSystemException: Could not create a file system
manager of class "org.apache.commons.vfs2.impl.StandardFileSystemManager".
at org.apache.commons.vfs2.VFS.createManager(VFS.java:
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
My +1 on this too :-) great idea Matt.
Bruno P. Kinoshita
http://kinoshita.eti.br
http://tupilabs.com
>
> From: Matt Benson
>To: dev@commons.apache.org
>Sent: Wednesday, 13 June 2012 1:00 PM
>Subject: [functor] modularization
>
>I think it would be useful to
Maven and ant builds work fine on Windows 7 with JDK 1.6. Artifacts and
site look good.
+1
Oliver
Am 13.06.2012 00:33, schrieb Gary Gregory:
Hello All:
This is a VOTE to release Commons IO 2.4-RC2.
Changes since RC1:
- Fix a bug in the new code for IO-326: Add new FileUtils.sizeOf[Directory
I like it! Sounds like something we should do with proxy2! :)
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
> I think it would be useful to extract at least the interfaces to an
> api module, so that other libraries could depend on [functor] without
> bringing along everything. Does any
On 13 June 2012 18:30, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 06:59:05PM +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>> Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 03:05:13PM +0200, Xavier Detant wrote:
>> >> The byte code generated by the compiler is totally independent from the
>> >> JVM th
great +1 on that - when working towards the first [functor] release, I
was worried that if our intention is including [functor] in BVal, I
would have brought a lot of unused stuff.
count on my support!
best,
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
htt
I am sensing that he would like the "history" item at
http://commons.apache.org/bsf/faq.html updated to include him.
Ralph
On Jun 13, 2012, at 10:19 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 13 June 2012 17:01, Joseph Kesselman wrote:
>> Just a quick note/quibble re BSF's history:
>>
>> I, Joe Kesselman (the sam
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 06:59:05PM +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 03:05:13PM +0200, Xavier Detant wrote:
> >> The byte code generated by the compiler is totally independent from the
> >> JVM that will be used to run it.
> >
> > Totally independe
On 13 June 2012 17:01, Joseph Kesselman wrote:
> Just a quick note/quibble re BSF's history:
>
> I, Joe Kesselman (the same IBMer who contributed some code to Xerces and
> quite a lot to Xalan) did a lot of the early prototyping work on BSF. The
> concept and initial sketch was certainly Sanjiva's
On 13 June 2012 10:54, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> Hi.
>
>> >
>> > Is there a way for an application to depend on the classes defined in the
>> > "test" subtree of the code repository?
>>
>> If the component releases the test jar, then it should be possible.
>
> It seems that it's not released as a J
Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 03:05:13PM +0200, Xavier Detant wrote:
>> The byte code generated by the compiler is totally independent from the
>> JVM that will be used to run it.
>
> Totally independent? Compiling with 1.7 and running with 1.6 will raise
> this error:
> Unsu
Hi Gilles,
I can't say for sure that this environment variable takes precedence over
anything in the pom.xml, there may be some setting that override it or chooses
a specific JVM :-)
I'm compiling and testing commons-io using Sun JDK and IBM JDK setting the
environment variable in a console.
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 05:32:14PM +0200, Xavier Detant wrote:
> Ok, my bad, I didn't explain myself clearly…
> I meant, the byte code generated by the compiler is totally independent
> from the _kind_ of JVM
> that will be used to run it.
>
> So a code compiled for 1.6 will run on a sun JDK as
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:53:08AM -0400, James Carman wrote:
> You'd be better off using something like Jenkins for this. You could
> set up different jobs to run your builds under different conditions
> (windoze vs. linux, jdk7 vs. jdk6, etc.)
I don't deny that such a tool is useful, but my pur
Just a quick note/quibble re BSF's history:
I, Joe Kesselman (the same IBMer who contributed some code to Xerces and
quite a lot to Xalan) did a lot of the early prototyping work on BSF.
The concept and initial sketch was certainly Sanjiva's, as part of some
other bean composition work we were
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 08:43:17AM -0700, Bruno P. Kinoshita wrote:
> I agree with James, Jenkins is a great choice for such tasks.
>
> That's what I do when I want to test a project with a different JVM, but have
> no time to set up Jenkins jobs.
>
> $ export JAVA_HOME=/opt/java/ibm...
> $ mvn
I think it would be useful to extract at least the interfaces to an
api module, so that other libraries could depend on [functor] without
bringing along everything. Does anyone have any feelings on further
subdivisions within the [functor] codebase that might be useful?
Matt
I agree with James, Jenkins is a great choice for such tasks.
That's what I do when I want to test a project with a different JVM, but have
no time to set up Jenkins jobs.
$ export JAVA_HOME=/opt/java/ibm...
$ mvn clean test install
Just my 0.02 cents :-)
Cheers
Bruno P. Kinoshita
http://kin
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The "Sanity Check of APIs, etc." page has been changed by MattBenson:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/Sanity%20Check%20of%20APIs%2C%20etc.?action=diff&rev1=7&rev2=8
(Same question
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The "Sanity Check of APIs, etc." page has been changed by MattBenson:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/Sanity%20Check%20of%20APIs%2C%20etc.?action=diff&rev1=6&rev2=7
(Same question
My +1.
Gary
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hello All:
>
> This is a VOTE to release Commons IO 2.4-RC2.
>
> Changes since RC1:
> - Fix a bug in the new code for IO-326: Add new
> FileUtils.sizeOf[Directory] APIs to return BigInteger.
> - IO-336: Yottabyte (YB) incorrect
Ok, my bad, I didn't explain myself clearly…
I meant, the byte code generated by the compiler is totally independent
from the _kind_ of JVM
that will be used to run it.
So a code compiled for 1.6 will run on a sun JDK as on a openJDK.
Nevertheless, the code must be compiled for the right versio
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The "Sanity Check of APIs, etc." page has been changed by MattBenson:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/Sanity%20Check%20of%20APIs%2C%20etc.?action=diff&rev1=5&rev2=6
It doesn't seem
You'd be better off using something like Jenkins for this. You could
set up different jobs to run your builds under different conditions
(windoze vs. linux, jdk7 vs. jdk6, etc.)
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Gilles Sadowski
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 03:05:13PM +0200, Xavier Detant wr
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 03:05:13PM +0200, Xavier Detant wrote:
> The byte code generated by the compiler is totally independent from the JVM
> that will be used to run it.
Totally independent? Compiling with 1.7 and running with 1.6 will raise this
error:
Unsupported major.minor version 51.0
>
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-jmx has an issue affecting its community integration.
T
Hi again,
2012/6/13 Gilles Sadowski :
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:34:51PM +0200, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> 2012/6/13 Gilles Sadowski :
>> > Hi.
>> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Is there a way for an application to depend on the classes defined in
>> >> > the
>> >> > "test" subtree of the code repo
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
The byte code generated by the compiler is totally independent from the JVM
that will be used to run it. So I think the point is not «How to compile
using the right JDK?» but «How to run with using the right JVM?» Am I
wrong? If so, this can't be done at compile time, so it can't be done via
maven,
Hello.
>
> With maven, you can configure the compiler to compile in the version you
> want.
>
> Add this to the pom.xml and set the arguments as you which.
>
>
>
>
> org.apache.maven.plugins
> maven-compiler-plugin
>
Hi,
With maven, you can configure the compiler to compile in the version you
want.
Add this to the pom.xml and set the arguments as you which.
org.apache.maven.plugins
maven-compiler-plugin
2.4
I like the artifact abstraction idea.
On Jun 13, 2012 5:32 AM, "Mark Struberg" wrote:
> I grabbed a bit deeper and it's even more fup.
>
> Some containers don't even add 'file://' to the externalForm() they return
> in their URLs. You have to add this yourself when doing new URL().
> There is
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:34:51PM +0200, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2012/6/13 Gilles Sadowski :
> > Hi.
> >
> >> >
> >> > Is there a way for an application to depend on the classes defined in the
> >> > "test" subtree of the code repository?
> >>
> >> If the component releases the test jar,
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:48:31PM +0200, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> Yes, that switch is called PATH (environment variable).
Do you mean that I should change the PATH variable just to build Commons
Math?
I surely hope that there is a more flexible way.
With "ant", all that's needed is to define JAV
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
Yes, that switch is called PATH (environment variable).
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Gilles Sadowski
wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Are there command-line switches that will select a specific JDK?
> I.e. I have several of them installed:
>
> $ ls -l /usr/lib/jvm
> total 36
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 2
Hi,
2012/6/13 Gilles Sadowski :
> Hi.
>
>> >
>> > Is there a way for an application to depend on the classes defined in the
>> > "test" subtree of the code repository?
>>
>> If the component releases the test jar, then it should be possible.
>
> It seems that it's not released as a JAR (probably o
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=23174&projectId=97
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Wed 13 Jun 2012 10:20:54 +
Finished at: Wed 13 Jun 2012 10:24:10 +
Total time: 3m 16s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Hello.
Are there command-line switches that will select a specific JDK?
I.e. I have several of them installed:
$ ls -l /usr/lib/jvm
total 36
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 24 Dec 17 11:04 default-java ->
java-1.6.0-openjdk-amd64
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Jan 5 18:27 java-1.5.0-gcj -> java-1.5.0-g
Hi.
> >
> > Is there a way for an application to depend on the classes defined in the
> > "test" subtree of the code repository?
>
> If the component releases the test jar, then it should be possible.
It seems that it's not released as a JAR (probably only in the zip/tar
and source archive).
>
I grabbed a bit deeper and it's even more fup.
Some containers don't even add 'file://' to the externalForm() they return in
their URLs. You have to add this yourself when doing new URL().
There is no way to have new URL() working properly in a generic way. We must go
Davids route via an 'Ar
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-graph has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jxpath has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issu
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-math has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
49 matches
Mail list logo