[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-scxml-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-08-29 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: [math] UnexpectedNegativeIntegerException

2012-08-29 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 29/08/2012 00:51, Gilles Sadowski a écrit : Hi Luc. Hi Gilles, First off, I'd like to make it quite clear that _I_ was fine (and still am) about a singly rooted hierarchy of exceptions for CM. I nevertheless answer to your reply because we differ on the rationale for such a change,

[math] Re: Single root for Exceptions

2012-08-29 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 29/08/2012 01:40, Gilles Sadowski a écrit : Hi. Hello, [...] I think I get your point, but again given transitive / nested dependencies I would not want to depend on it, even if all of the components have single-rooted exception hierarchies. This is especially true if not all

Re: [vfs] dependencies update to new versions etc.

2012-08-29 Thread Gary Gregory
ping to Jonny? Gary On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 12:05 AM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.comwrote: I will second what others have said. There really is no way to effectively review an 800k patch. If it is that big largely because it is including a jackrabbit jar directly into the project I

Re: [codec] Vacuous bit mask operation on integer value in UnixCrypt

2012-08-29 Thread Gary Gregory
How about this: 1. Let's get the digest package to 100% code coverage (or as closed to it as possible) 2. Clean up the code (removing the vacuous code) Also to do is fix the remaining check styles. Patches welcome! Gary On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 2:47 AM, Thomas Neidhart

Re: [math] UnexpectedNegativeIntegerException

2012-08-29 Thread Phil Steitz
One example I often use is launch window computation for rockets. One way to compute them is brute force simulation: you simply try all launch times and for each one you perform the simulation of the early orbits phase. If at any time something breaks (a polynomial that never crosses zero, an

Re: [math] Re: Single root for Exceptions

2012-08-29 Thread Sébastien Brisard
Hello, 2012/8/29 Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr: Le 29/08/2012 01:40, Gilles Sadowski a écrit : Hi. Hello, [...] I think I get your point, but again given transitive / nested dependencies I would not want to depend on it, even if all of the components have single-rooted exception

Re: [math] Re: Single root for Exceptions

2012-08-29 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 29/08/2012 20:31, Sébastien Brisard a écrit : Hello, Hi Sébastien, 2012/8/29 Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr: Le 29/08/2012 01:40, Gilles Sadowski a écrit : Hi. Hello, [...] I think I get your point, but again given transitive / nested dependencies I would not want to depend

Re: [math] UnexpectedNegativeIntegerException

2012-08-29 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hello. [...] I encountered this need in two different cases. The first one was to identify very precisely an error type, even with finer granularity than exception type. Parsing the error message to recognize the exception is evil, checking the enumerate used in the pattern is less

Re: [math] Re: Single root for Exceptions

2012-08-29 Thread Gilles Sadowski
[...] I think we had a discussion a few months ago on how exceptions should be documented. We came to no agreement at that time, although one option (which I followed) was to - remove unchecked exceptions from the method's signature - add the unchecjked exceptions to the javadoc.

Re: [math] Re: Single root for Exceptions

2012-08-29 Thread Gilles Sadowski
No, you are not missing anything. Having only the javadoc without the declaration in the signature is a pain. I would prefer to keep both. +1 Just going boom with an unadvertised RTE is not acceptable behavior. We used to be very good about documenting and advertising all exceptions

Re: [math] Re: Single root for Exceptions

2012-08-29 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hello. To summarize: (1) Does anyone disagree with having all CM exceptions inherit from a new MathRuntimeException which itself will inherit from the standard RuntimeException? (2) Does anyone disagree with all exceptions being mandatorily advertized in the throws clause of

Re: [codec] Vacuous bit mask operation on integer value in UnixCrypt

2012-08-29 Thread Christian Hammers
Hello I did some more unit tests. Could you grant me commit rights (Apache user chammers) or should I fill your inbox with patches? :-) BTW, I would have made a git fork but the $Id$ lines show up in every diff. Why are they not expanded in the git shadow repo? I thought that would happen at the

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-dbcp (in module commons-dbcp-1.x) failed

2012-08-29 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-dbcp has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-dbcp2 (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-08-29 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-dbcp2 has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: [math] Re: Single root for Exceptions

2012-08-29 Thread Phil Steitz
On 8/29/12 3:04 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: Hello. To summarize: (1) Does anyone disagree with having all CM exceptions inherit from a new MathRuntimeException which itself will inherit from the standard RuntimeException? +0 (2) Does anyone disagree with all exceptions being

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-exec-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-08-29 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: [math] Re: Single root for Exceptions

2012-08-29 Thread Sébastien Brisard
Hello, 2012/8/30 Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org: Hello. To summarize: (1) Does anyone disagree with having all CM exceptions inherit from a new MathRuntimeException which itself will inherit from the standard RuntimeException? +0: my background is not good enough.

[math] Binary or text resource files?

2012-08-29 Thread Sébastien Brisard
Hi, testing of special functions involves comparing actual values returned by CM with expected values as computed with an arbitrary precision software (I use Maxima [1] for this purpose). As I intend these tests to be assesments of the overall accuracy of our implementations, the number of test

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-digester3 (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-08-29 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[math] Please have a look to MATH-852: Improvements to the Developer's Guide

2012-08-29 Thread Sébastien Brisard
Thanks a lot! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-chain2 (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-08-29 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-chain2 has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-08-29 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-dbutils (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-08-29 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-dbutils has an issue affecting its community integration. This