2013/3/1 :
> Author: lukaszlenart
> Date: Fri Mar 1 18:13:17 2013
> New Revision: 1451672
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1451672
> Log:
> Excludes files from rat report
>
> Modified:
> commons/proper/ognl/trunk/pom.xml
>
> Modified: commons/proper/ognl/trunk/pom.xml
> URL:
> http://svn.apac
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> HI Naill
>
>
> 2013/3/1 Niall Pemberton
>
>> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Benedikt Ritter
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I'd like to have some feedback on [BEANUTILS-409] - 'describe' method
>> > returning Incorrect array value [1]. If
Am 01.03.2013 09:22, schrieb Luc Maisonobe:
Hi Benedikt,
Le 01/03/2013 09:14, Benedikt Ritter a écrit :
Nobody seems to know (or to care ;-), so I'll wait until 72 hours have
passed. If nobody objects until after 72 hours have passed, I'll file an
issue for INFRA.
As far as I know, there are
Am 01.03.2013 09:20, schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
Hi Oliver,
2013/2/28 Oliver Heger
Hi,
Am 28.02.2013 14:28, schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
2013/2/23 Benedikt Ritter
Hi,
I just wanted to start a discussion whether we should push out a bugfix
release or start to work on new features right aw
Hello Jean-Marc,
2013/3/1 Jean-Marc Borer
> Nobody can answer that?
>
> On Thursday, February 28, 2013, Jean-Marc Borer wrote:
>
> > OK guys, thank you for your feedback. I'll provide those patches, but
> > it is difficult sometimes to keep up with them because the source code
> > in trunk chan
looks good now
Thanks !
2013/3/1 Mark Thomas :
> On 28/02/2013 15:48, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> Can someone give me karma to jira in order to assign to me and close
>> issues ?
>
>
> Yes, but you need full Jira admin which means an Infra person.
>
> I've added you.
>
>
>> Or I need to creat
Nobody can answer that?
On Thursday, February 28, 2013, Jean-Marc Borer wrote:
> OK guys, thank you for your feedback. I'll provide those patches, but
> it is difficult sometimes to keep up with them because the source code
> in trunk changes and patches may conflict (it happened recently to me
>
On 01/03/2013 08:41, KONTRA, Gergely wrote:
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
Sorry, but the github mirrors are read only (AFAIK). Usually contributions
are made through SVN diff files uploaded to Jira. Would it be possible for
you to upload an SVN diff to jira? Don't forg
On 28/02/2013 15:48, Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hi,
Can someone give me karma to jira in order to assign to me and close issues ?
Yes, but you need full Jira admin which means an Infra person.
I've added you.
Or I need to create a INFRA jira ?
I normally handle these shortly after seeing them. Bu
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Sorry, but the github mirrors are read only (AFAIK). Usually contributions
> are made through SVN diff files uploaded to Jira. Would it be possible for
> you to upload an SVN diff to jira? Don't forget to add some unit tests ;-)
>
Yep, git
2013/3/1 Gary Gregory
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 3:11 AM, Benedikt Ritter
> wrote:
>
> > 2013/3/1 Gary Gregory
> >
> > > This might have to be done of a component by component basis, not sure?
> > > Let's try with one, which one?
> > >
> >
> > I think he has only to be added to the commons-develo
Hello Gergely,
2013/3/1 KONTRA, Gergely
> Hi all!
>
> As I find my concrete issue in the JIRA here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FILEUPLOAD-195#comment-13589406 I
> have a new question:
>
> I am ready to fix this problem, and I would like to contribute the result
> to the community.
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 3:11 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> 2013/3/1 Gary Gregory
>
> > This might have to be done of a component by component basis, not sure?
> > Let's try with one, which one?
> >
>
> I think he has only to be added to the commons-developer group.
> Don't know who has the karma t
Hi all!
As I find my concrete issue in the JIRA here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FILEUPLOAD-195#comment-13589406 I
have a new question:
I am ready to fix this problem, and I would like to contribute the result
to the community.
But first, IS THERE ANYBODY FIXING 2GB UPLOAD LIMIT SILEN
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2013/3/1 sebb :
> > On 28 February 2013 21:26, Thomas Neidhart
> wrote:
> >> On 02/28/2013 10:04 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
> >>> +1, looks good.
> >>>
> >>> Just one minor thing: The source release now contains the cgi for the
> >>> download p
2013/3/1 Olivier Lamy :
> to test website it's the usual: mvn clean site (then browse files in
> target/site/)
> to deploy: mvn clean site-deploy.
> and site-content must excluded from rat. Do you want to fix that ? If not I
> can.
I just moved site-content into target/ folder and that solved the
2013/3/1 sebb :
> On 28 February 2013 21:26, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>> On 02/28/2013 10:04 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
>>> +1, looks good.
>>>
>>> Just one minor thing: The source release now contains the cgi for the
>>> download page. Is this expected to be there? I did not notice it before,
>>> but
to test website it's the usual: mvn clean site (then browse files in
target/site/)
to deploy: mvn clean site-deploy.
and site-content must excluded from rat. Do you want to fix that ? If not I can.
2013/3/1 Lukasz Lenart :
> 2013/3/1 Lukasz Lenart :
>> How can I update ognl website? Simple checkou
Hi Benedikt,
Le 01/03/2013 09:14, Benedikt Ritter a écrit :
> Nobody seems to know (or to care ;-), so I'll wait until 72 hours have
> passed. If nobody objects until after 72 hours have passed, I'll file an
> issue for INFRA.
As far as I know, there are no specific decisions about Git mirrors.
T
2013/3/1 Lukasz Lenart :
> How can I update ognl website? Simple checkout [1] and update what I
> need? and then what to do?
I found this [1], but I have one question, how to check locally how
the site will look like before deploying it? I have the only solution:
mvn clean site
copy target/site i
Hi Oliver,
2013/2/28 Oliver Heger
> Hi,
>
> Am 28.02.2013 14:28, schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
>
> 2013/2/23 Benedikt Ritter
>>
>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I just wanted to start a discussion whether we should push out a bugfix
>>> release or start to work on new features right away and release a 1.9
>>> (inc
Nobody seems to know (or to care ;-), so I'll wait until 72 hours have
passed. If nobody objects until after 72 hours have passed, I'll file an
issue for INFRA.
Benedikt
2013/2/27 Benedikt Ritter
> Hi,
>
> there is an issue to create a git mirror of BeanUtils [1]. This seems to
> be as easy as
HI Naill
2013/3/1 Niall Pemberton
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Benedikt Ritter
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to have some feedback on [BEANUTILS-409] - 'describe' method
> > returning Incorrect array value [1]. If a bean has an array or collection
> > property describe will only ret
Le 27/02/2013 22:37, Thomas Neidhart a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Email 1.3.1 based on RC3.
>
> This release candidate has the following changes compared to RC2:
>
> * Added missing slf4j binding which caused test failures with IBM JDKs
>
> The files:
>
> T
24 matches
Mail list logo