Re: svn commit: r1451672 - /commons/proper/ognl/trunk/pom.xml

2013-03-01 Thread Olivier Lamy
2013/3/1 : > Author: lukaszlenart > Date: Fri Mar 1 18:13:17 2013 > New Revision: 1451672 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1451672 > Log: > Excludes files from rat report > > Modified: > commons/proper/ognl/trunk/pom.xml > > Modified: commons/proper/ognl/trunk/pom.xml > URL: > http://svn.apac

Re: [beanutils] describe() has strange behavior for collection properties ([BEANUTILS-409])

2013-03-01 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > HI Naill > > > 2013/3/1 Niall Pemberton > >> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Benedikt Ritter >> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I'd like to have some feedback on [BEANUTILS-409] - 'describe' method >> > returning Incorrect array value [1]. If

Re: [ALL] Adding Projects to ASF git mirrors

2013-03-01 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 01.03.2013 09:22, schrieb Luc Maisonobe: Hi Benedikt, Le 01/03/2013 09:14, Benedikt Ritter a écrit : Nobody seems to know (or to care ;-), so I'll wait until 72 hours have passed. If nobody objects until after 72 hours have passed, I'll file an issue for INFRA. As far as I know, there are

Re: [BeanUtils] Next release 1.8.4 or 1.9?

2013-03-01 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 01.03.2013 09:20, schrieb Benedikt Ritter: Hi Oliver, 2013/2/28 Oliver Heger Hi, Am 28.02.2013 14:28, schrieb Benedikt Ritter: 2013/2/23 Benedikt Ritter Hi, I just wanted to start a discussion whether we should push out a bugfix release or start to work on new features right aw

Re: [VFS] UserAuthenticationData enhancement

2013-03-01 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hello Jean-Marc, 2013/3/1 Jean-Marc Borer > Nobody can answer that? > > On Thursday, February 28, 2013, Jean-Marc Borer wrote: > > > OK guys, thank you for your feedback. I'll provide those patches, but > > it is difficult sometimes to keep up with them because the source code > > in trunk chan

Re: Karma on jira

2013-03-01 Thread Olivier Lamy
looks good now Thanks ! 2013/3/1 Mark Thomas : > On 28/02/2013 15:48, Olivier Lamy wrote: >> >> Hi, >> Can someone give me karma to jira in order to assign to me and close >> issues ? > > > Yes, but you need full Jira admin which means an Infra person. > > I've added you. > > >> Or I need to creat

Re: [VFS] UserAuthenticationData enhancement

2013-03-01 Thread Jean-Marc Borer
Nobody can answer that? On Thursday, February 28, 2013, Jean-Marc Borer wrote: > OK guys, thank you for your feedback. I'll provide those patches, but > it is difficult sometimes to keep up with them because the source code > in trunk changes and patches may conflict (it happened recently to me >

Re: [fileupload] Uploading large files

2013-03-01 Thread Mark Thomas
On 01/03/2013 08:41, KONTRA, Gergely wrote: On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: Sorry, but the github mirrors are read only (AFAIK). Usually contributions are made through SVN diff files uploaded to Jira. Would it be possible for you to upload an SVN diff to jira? Don't forg

Re: Karma on jira

2013-03-01 Thread Mark Thomas
On 28/02/2013 15:48, Olivier Lamy wrote: Hi, Can someone give me karma to jira in order to assign to me and close issues ? Yes, but you need full Jira admin which means an Infra person. I've added you. Or I need to create a INFRA jira ? I normally handle these shortly after seeing them. Bu

Re: [fileupload] Uploading large files

2013-03-01 Thread KONTRA, Gergely
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Sorry, but the github mirrors are read only (AFAIK). Usually contributions > are made through SVN diff files uploaded to Jira. Would it be possible for > you to upload an SVN diff to jira? Don't forget to add some unit tests ;-) > Yep, git

Re: Karma on jira

2013-03-01 Thread Benedikt Ritter
2013/3/1 Gary Gregory > On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 3:11 AM, Benedikt Ritter > wrote: > > > 2013/3/1 Gary Gregory > > > > > This might have to be done of a component by component basis, not sure? > > > Let's try with one, which one? > > > > > > > I think he has only to be added to the commons-develo

Re: [fileupload] Uploading large files

2013-03-01 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hello Gergely, 2013/3/1 KONTRA, Gergely > Hi all! > > As I find my concrete issue in the JIRA here: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FILEUPLOAD-195#comment-13589406 I > have a new question: > > I am ready to fix this problem, and I would like to contribute the result > to the community.

Re: Karma on jira

2013-03-01 Thread Gary Gregory
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 3:11 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > 2013/3/1 Gary Gregory > > > This might have to be done of a component by component basis, not sure? > > Let's try with one, which one? > > > > I think he has only to be added to the commons-developer group. > Don't know who has the karma t

Re: [fileupload] Uploading large files

2013-03-01 Thread KONTRA, Gergely
Hi all! As I find my concrete issue in the JIRA here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FILEUPLOAD-195#comment-13589406 I have a new question: I am ready to fix this problem, and I would like to contribute the result to the community. But first, IS THERE ANYBODY FIXING 2GB UPLOAD LIMIT SILEN

Re: Source now contains download.cgi [was: [VOTE] Release of Commons Email 1.3.1 based on RC3]

2013-03-01 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > 2013/3/1 sebb : > > On 28 February 2013 21:26, Thomas Neidhart > wrote: > >> On 02/28/2013 10:04 PM, Oliver Heger wrote: > >>> +1, looks good. > >>> > >>> Just one minor thing: The source release now contains the cgi for the > >>> download p

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-03-01 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2013/3/1 Olivier Lamy : > to test website it's the usual: mvn clean site (then browse files in > target/site/) > to deploy: mvn clean site-deploy. > and site-content must excluded from rat. Do you want to fix that ? If not I > can. I just moved site-content into target/ folder and that solved the

Re: Source now contains download.cgi [was: [VOTE] Release of Commons Email 1.3.1 based on RC3]

2013-03-01 Thread Olivier Lamy
2013/3/1 sebb : > On 28 February 2013 21:26, Thomas Neidhart wrote: >> On 02/28/2013 10:04 PM, Oliver Heger wrote: >>> +1, looks good. >>> >>> Just one minor thing: The source release now contains the cgi for the >>> download page. Is this expected to be there? I did not notice it before, >>> but

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-03-01 Thread Olivier Lamy
to test website it's the usual: mvn clean site (then browse files in target/site/) to deploy: mvn clean site-deploy. and site-content must excluded from rat. Do you want to fix that ? If not I can. 2013/3/1 Lukasz Lenart : > 2013/3/1 Lukasz Lenart : >> How can I update ognl website? Simple checkou

Re: [ALL] Adding Projects to ASF git mirrors

2013-03-01 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Hi Benedikt, Le 01/03/2013 09:14, Benedikt Ritter a écrit : > Nobody seems to know (or to care ;-), so I'll wait until 72 hours have > passed. If nobody objects until after 72 hours have passed, I'll file an > issue for INFRA. As far as I know, there are no specific decisions about Git mirrors. T

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-03-01 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2013/3/1 Lukasz Lenart : > How can I update ognl website? Simple checkout [1] and update what I > need? and then what to do? I found this [1], but I have one question, how to check locally how the site will look like before deploying it? I have the only solution: mvn clean site copy target/site i

Re: [BeanUtils] Next release 1.8.4 or 1.9?

2013-03-01 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hi Oliver, 2013/2/28 Oliver Heger > Hi, > > Am 28.02.2013 14:28, schrieb Benedikt Ritter: > > 2013/2/23 Benedikt Ritter >> >> Hi, >>> >>> I just wanted to start a discussion whether we should push out a bugfix >>> release or start to work on new features right away and release a 1.9 >>> (inc

Re: [ALL] Adding Projects to ASF git mirrors

2013-03-01 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Nobody seems to know (or to care ;-), so I'll wait until 72 hours have passed. If nobody objects until after 72 hours have passed, I'll file an issue for INFRA. Benedikt 2013/2/27 Benedikt Ritter > Hi, > > there is an issue to create a git mirror of BeanUtils [1]. This seems to > be as easy as

Re: [beanutils] describe() has strange behavior for collection properties ([BEANUTILS-409])

2013-03-01 Thread Benedikt Ritter
HI Naill 2013/3/1 Niall Pemberton > On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Benedikt Ritter > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'd like to have some feedback on [BEANUTILS-409] - 'describe' method > > returning Incorrect array value [1]. If a bean has an array or collection > > property describe will only ret

Re: [VOTE] Release of Commons Email 1.3.1 based on RC3

2013-03-01 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 27/02/2013 22:37, Thomas Neidhart a écrit : > Hi, > > I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Email 1.3.1 based on RC3. > > This release candidate has the following changes compared to RC2: > > * Added missing slf4j binding which caused test failures with IBM JDKs > > The files: > > T