On 6/23/13 3:14 PM, Gilles wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Jun 2013 22:36:04 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 6/21/13 5:17 PM, Ajo Fod wrote:
>>> I've submitted a patch for the issue (see MATH-994). This will
>>> allow users
>>> to integrate functions with infinity as one of the bounds.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Ajo
Hi Gary,
thanks for pushing csv forward. I feel we are getting close to actually
releasing something :-)
2013/6/24 Gary Gregory
> I've done a bit of fiddling with the code and JIRA.
>
> It seems the biggest issue is the builder API. Then there are remaining
> issues:
>
>
> https://issues.apach
I've done a bit of fiddling with the code and JIRA.
It seems the biggest issue is the builder API. Then there are remaining
issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20CSV%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%29%20ORDER%20BY%20key%20ASC
If w
On Sat, 22 Jun 2013 22:36:04 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 6/21/13 5:17 PM, Ajo Fod wrote:
I've submitted a patch for the issue (see MATH-994). This will allow
users
to integrate functions with infinity as one of the bounds.
Cheers,
Ajo Fod.
Thanks for bringing the discussion to the dev list,
On 23 June 2013 21:02, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>
>> On 23 June 2013 20:35, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> On 23/06/2013 20:28, sebb wrote:
On 23 June 2013 19:56, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>
> Am 23.06.2013 um 20:16 schrieb sebb :
>
>> On 23 June 2013 16:10, Jörg Schaible wr
sebb wrote:
> On 23 June 2013 20:35, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 23/06/2013 20:28, sebb wrote:
>>> On 23 June 2013 19:56, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
Am 23.06.2013 um 20:16 schrieb sebb :
> On 23 June 2013 16:10, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>> sebb wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>>
Hi,
I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Collections 4.0-alpha1
based on RC1.
The files:
The artifacts are deployed to Nexus:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-060/org/apache/commons/commons-collections4/4.0-alpha1/
Distribution files:
https://dist.apa
sebb wrote:
> On 23 June 2013 16:10, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>> sebb wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>> But we still need to resolve:
>>> - where in SVN these tools belong
>>> - how to ensure the tools are readily available to RMs
>>
>> Well, don't we have the possibility to publish these plugins somewhere
On 23 June 2013 20:35, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 23/06/2013 20:28, sebb wrote:
>> On 23 June 2013 19:56, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 23.06.2013 um 20:16 schrieb sebb :
>>>
On 23 June 2013 16:10, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>> But we still need to
On 23/06/2013 20:28, sebb wrote:
> On 23 June 2013 19:56, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>>
>> Am 23.06.2013 um 20:16 schrieb sebb :
>>
>>> On 23 June 2013 16:10, Jörg Schaible wrote:
sebb wrote:
[snip]
> But we still need to resolve:
> - where in SVN these tools belong
>>
>>
On 23 June 2013 19:56, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>
> Am 23.06.2013 um 20:16 schrieb sebb :
>
>> On 23 June 2013 16:10, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>>> sebb wrote:
>>>
>>> [snip]
>>>
But we still need to resolve:
- where in SVN these tools belong
>
> Let's just create a new top level folder under
Am 23.06.2013 um 20:16 schrieb sebb :
> On 23 June 2013 16:10, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>> sebb wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>> But we still need to resolve:
>>> - where in SVN these tools belong
Let's just create a new top level folder under
http://svn.apache.org/asf/commons. release-tools or someth
On 23 June 2013 16:10, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>> But we still need to resolve:
>> - where in SVN these tools belong
>> - how to ensure the tools are readily available to RMs
>
> Well, don't we have the possibility to publish these plugins somewhere on
> the web site? All t
sebb wrote:
[snip]
> But we still need to resolve:
> - where in SVN these tools belong
> - how to ensure the tools are readily available to RMs
Well, don't we have the possibility to publish these plugins somewhere on
the web site? All that Maven actually needs is a structure that looks like a
sebb wrote:
> On 22 June 2013 12:50, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>> 2013/6/22 Jörg Schaible
[snip]
>>> Bad. At least to me. Especially since we always claim that we actually
>>> release the source and not necessarily the binaries. So every user that
>>> downloads our source can no longer simply bui
On 22 June 2013 17:41, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 6/22/13 7:26 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 22/06/2013 14:45, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>
>> I don't have answers neither do I have the Maven knowledge I suspect is
>> necessary to figure the answers out. I encourage those that do have the
>> Maven skills
On 22 June 2013 15:26, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 22/06/2013 14:45, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> I'm for whatever does the RM process easier and less error prone. If
>> that means maven plugins, so be it.
>
> This is written as someone who has never released a commons component
> and is very grateful for t
On 22 June 2013 19:42, Oliver Heger wrote:
> Am 22.06.2013 19:10, schrieb Gary Gregory:
>
>> On Jun 22, 2013, at 12:41, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>
>>> On 6/22/13 7:26 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 22/06/2013 14:45, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> I'm for whatever does the RM process easier and l
18 matches
Mail list logo
