On 14/12/2013 23:05, Phil Steitz wrote:
I would like to cut an RC containing recent fixes for POOL-240,
243. Any objections? Review of the fix for POOL-243 and any other
improvements to the code or docs much appreciated.
It needs to be 2.1 not 2.0.1 as I have added a couple of new features
Hi all,
1.6 has a regression inside the tar package that causes serious problems
for people not using buffered streams when reading archives.
Current trunk contains some new code that seems to have acceptable test
coverage by now. I know Emmanuel is working on an IMPLODE
implementation for the
Keep the release train moving... :)
Gary
Original message
From: Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org
Date:12/16/2013 06:19 (GMT-05:00)
To: dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: [compress] cutting 1.7?
Hi all,
1.6 has a regression inside the tar package that causes serious
On Dec 16, 2013, at 3:34 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 14/12/2013 23:05, Phil Steitz wrote:
I would like to cut an RC containing recent fixes for POOL-240,
243. Any objections? Review of the fix for POOL-243 and any other
improvements to the code or docs much appreciated.
Keep the release train moving... :)
+1
Amen to that :)
Am 15.12.2013 22:29, schrieb Phil Steitz:
On 12/14/13, 12:01 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
Am 14.12.2013 05:20, schrieb Phil Steitz:
On 12/13/13, 12:34 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/13/13, 11:34 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
On
