RE: [OGNL] A new release

I have not seen any updates on subversion since September. Are there any plans on a release? Either way, please commit the patch on https://issues.apache.org/jira/i#browse/OGNL-240 Is there something I can do for the project? -Jason > -Original Message- > From: simone.trip...@gmail.com

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache Commons Codec 1.9 Released

The Apache Commons Codec team is pleased to announce the Apache commons-codec 1.9 release! The Apache Codec package contains simple encoder and decoders for various formats such as Base64 and Hexadecimal. In addition to these widely used encoders and decoders, the Apache Codec package also maintai

[CANCELLED][VOTE] Release [pool] 2.1 based on RC1

The clirr breakage needs to dealt with / explained in the release notes. As it stands, the statements about compatibility are not correct. I think the breakage is OK, but would appreciate suggestions on how to document in the release notes. Phil On 12/23/13, 9:21 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > Pool 2

Re: [VOTE] Release [pool] 2.1 based on RC1

Thanks for the review! On 12/24/13, 10:22 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > +1 > > BUT: > > - The Clirr breakage needs to be explained in the Overview page in a > "Migrating from 2.0" section IMO. Not sure that is necessary, but agree it needs to be mentioned / explained in the release notes. > - I also

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Commons Codec 1.9-RC1

The VOTE to release Commons Codec 1.9-RC1 passes with the following 5 binding votes: Oliver Heger Gary Gregory Benedikt Ritter Phil Steitz Jörg Schaible No other votes where cast. See http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#commons-pmc Thank you, Gary Gregory -- E-Mail: garydgreg.

Re: [VOTE] Release [pool] 2.1 based on RC1

+1 BUT: - The Clirr breakage needs to be explained in the Overview page in a "Migrating from 2.0" section IMO. - I also do not see anything in the change report like "Add method getBorrowedCount() to blah blah..." - There are two issues in the change report that do not include links to JIRA. Is t

RE: [CANCEL][VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.2 based on RC1

Happy holidays and thank you for shepherding the release.  Gary Original message From: Benedikt Ritter Date:12/24/2013 03:46 (GMT-05:00) To: Commons Developers List Subject: [CANCEL][VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.2 based on RC1 I've canceled this vote via replying to the

Re: [LANG] Document API breakage in FastDateFormat in JavaDoc?

On 24 December 2013 08:51, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hi, > > we have this API breakage in FastDateFormat between 3.1 and the upcoming > 3.2 release [1]. Gary suggested to make this explicit in the JavaDoc of > FastDateFormat [2]. > > I personally don't like this idea for the following reasons: > -

[COLLECTIONS] Introducing OrderStatisticTree

Hello, y'all and Merry Xmas! I am mailing you as to notify about a new patch patching the order-statistic tree in Commons Collections, which is contained in COLLECTIONS-479.patch. May I expect it to be reviewed any time soon? -- TIA, Rodion -

[LANG] Document API breakage in FastDateFormat in JavaDoc?

Hi, we have this API breakage in FastDateFormat between 3.1 and the upcoming 3.2 release [1]. Gary suggested to make this explicit in the JavaDoc of FastDateFormat [2]. I personally don't like this idea for the following reasons: - JavaDoc is about the functionality of a class. It is no migration

[CANCEL][VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.2 based on RC1

I've canceled this vote via replying to the other thread. This doesn't show up properly in Gmail. Since I assume a lot of us are using Gmail, I'm sending another message. Below are the original contents of the cancel mail: This vote is canceled to fix the following issues: - Release notes do not