On Sun, 4 Jan 2015 20:31:30 +, sebb wrote:
Did you see my mail from earlier today titled as below ?
Compiling and running examples
No, I missed it!
This explains how Commons NET examples are built and used.
Thanks for the reminder,
Gilles
On 4 January 2015 at 18:21, Gilles
wrote:
H
On Sun, 4 Jan 2015 14:20:53 +, sebb wrote:
On 4 January 2015 at 12:58, Gilles
wrote:
Hello.
On Sun, 04 Jan 2015 12:09:35 +0100, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Hi all,
Le 04/01/2015 02:07, Gilles a écrit :
It reminded me that I had yet to improve one toy example in the
"src/userguide/java/org/a
Hi.
On Sun, 04 Jan 2015 14:37:41 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 1/4/15 5:58 AM, Gilles wrote:
Hello.
On Sun, 04 Jan 2015 12:09:35 +0100, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Hi all,
Le 04/01/2015 02:07, Gilles a écrit :
On Fri, 02 Jan 2015 14:45:15 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
I am thinking about submitting a
On 2015-01-04, Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
> Most surprising to me is that it seems like the overhead of lots of
> small calls to RandomAccessFile.write seems to be a lot costlier than
> I thought it would be. It seems like consolidating to a larger byte
> array before calling write is a *lot* faste
On 5 January 2015 at 07:03, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> there have been some fixes in the last few days (mostly thanks to sebb) and
> my feeling is, that we're ready to cut 1.4.1 RC3.
Yes, I think it is in a stable state.
I have been checking the source with Java 1.4 on a Windows VM and
On 5 January 2015 at 13:43, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2015-01-04, Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
>
>> Most surprising to me is that it seems like the overhead of lots of
>> small calls to RandomAccessFile.write seems to be a lot costlier than
>> I thought it would be. It seems like consolidating to a
2015-01-05 15:12 GMT+01:00 sebb :
> On 5 January 2015 at 13:43, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> On 2015-01-04, Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
>>
>>> Most surprising to me is that it seems like the overhead of lots of
>>> small calls to RandomAccessFile.write seems to be a lot costlier than
>>> I thought it wo
2015-01-05 15:09 GMT+01:00 sebb :
> On 5 January 2015 at 07:03, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > there have been some fixes in the last few days (mostly thanks to sebb)
> and
> > my feeling is, that we're ready to cut 1.4.1 RC3.
>
> Yes, I think it is in a stable state.
> I have been ch
Please vote this issue up, if you like, since it is still pending...
2014-12-29 11:39 GMT+01:00 Benedikt Ritter :
> FYI: I have created INFRS-8949 [1], because the github mirror of imaging
> at https://github.com/apache/commons-imaging doesn't seem to sync anymore.
>
> Regards,
> Benedikt
>
> [1]
On 5 January 2015 at 14:33, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> 2015-01-05 15:09 GMT+01:00 sebb :
>
>> On 5 January 2015 at 07:03, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > there have been some fixes in the last few days (mostly thanks to sebb)
>> and
>> > my feeling is, that we're ready to cut 1.4.1 RC
On 1/5/15 5:39 AM, Gilles wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Sun, 04 Jan 2015 14:37:41 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 1/4/15 5:58 AM, Gilles wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> On Sun, 04 Jan 2015 12:09:35 +0100, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Hi all,
Le 04/01/2015 02:07, Gilles a écrit :
> On Fri, 02 Jan 2015 14
Send from my mobile device
> Am 05.01.2015 um 16:34 schrieb sebb :
>
>> On 5 January 2015 at 14:33, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>> 2015-01-05 15:09 GMT+01:00 sebb :
>>
On 5 January 2015 at 07:03, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
Hi all,
there have been some fixes in the last few days (
On 5 January 2015 at 15:54, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 1/5/15 5:39 AM, Gilles wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> On Sun, 04 Jan 2015 14:37:41 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 1/4/15 5:58 AM, Gilles wrote:
Hello.
On Sun, 04 Jan 2015 12:09:35 +0100, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Le 04/
If you are bumping the minimum java version, this should be really 1.5.
Technically the bump won't be a true drop in for someone on 1.4 but who
is on 1.4 anymore? Your call.
On Jan 5, 2015 10:11 AM, "Benedikt Ritter" wrote:
>
>
> Send from my mobile device
>
> > Am 05.01.2015 um 16:34 schrieb
On 5 January 2015 at 16:21, Paul Benedict wrote:
> If you are bumping the minimum java version, this should be really 1.5.
We are not moving to Java 1.5+, because that would require lots more
work (generics, Javadoc etc)
> Technically the bump won't be a true drop in for someone on 1.4 but w
On Mon, 5 Jan 2015 16:15:34 +, sebb wrote:
On 5 January 2015 at 15:54, Phil Steitz
wrote:
On 1/5/15 5:39 AM, Gilles wrote:
Hi.
On Sun, 04 Jan 2015 14:37:41 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 1/4/15 5:58 AM, Gilles wrote:
Hello.
On Sun, 04 Jan 2015 12:09:35 +0100, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Hi all
On Sun, 4 Jan 2015 20:31:30 +, sebb wrote:
Did you see my mail from earlier today titled as below ?
Compiling and running examples
This explains how Commons NET examples are built and used.
Copy-pasting Sebb's proposal from the other thread:
[Examples] can be invoked using java -jar c
Hello Romain,
what do I have to do to build the module web sites? After mvn site I have a
link "Project Modules" in the navigation, but the links to the module sites
don't work. Can you help?
Benedikt
2015-01-04 22:35 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau :
> Hi
>
> Another try with license/notice files
Hi
What I did was mainly mvn site for all module then copy all generate
site folder in a folder named as the module. For instance
http://people.apache.org/~rmannibucau/commons-jcs-2.0-beta-1/commons-jcs-jcache/index.html
was in commons-jcs-jcache/target/site/
Not sure it is the right procedure bu
Hello,
Normally building the toplevel project with
mvn site site:stage
should generate a complete site with all submodules in target/staging/
Dont forget to enable all profiles.
gruss
Bernd
--
http://bernd.eckenfels.net
- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -
Von: "Romain Manni-Bucau"
Gesende
2015-01-05 20:09 GMT+01:00 Bernd Eckenfels :
> Hello,
>
> Normally building the toplevel project with
>
> mvn site site:stage
>
> should generate a complete site with all submodules in target/staging/
>
> Dont forget to enable all profiles.
>
Fails with
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.
Le 05/01/2015 18:41, Gilles a écrit :
> On Sun, 4 Jan 2015 20:31:30 +, sebb wrote:
>> Did you see my mail from earlier today titled as below ?
>>
>> Compiling and running examples
>>
>> This explains how Commons NET examples are built and used.
>
> Copy-pasting Sebb's proposal from the other t
I've created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMAGING-156 to track
this change.
2015-01-04 21:12 GMT+01:00 sebb :
> +1
>
> On 4 January 2015 at 19:15, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > +1: Interfaces should be used to define contracts, not constants. I like
> > using classes to define constants.
> >
GitHub user based2 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/commons-io/pull/4
update to junit 4.12
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/based2/commons-io patch-1
Alternatively you can review and apply these ch
On Mon, 05 Jan 2015 20:43:18 +0100, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Le 05/01/2015 18:41, Gilles a écrit :
On Sun, 4 Jan 2015 20:31:30 +, sebb wrote:
Did you see my mail from earlier today titled as below ?
Compiling and running examples
This explains how Commons NET examples are built and used.
Co
Am Mon, 05 Jan 2015 23:35:49 +0100
schrieb Gilles :
> Which docs?
> I didn't intend to move the "userguide" document; only the Java
> examples currently under "src/userguide/java" would be moved to
>"src/main"
I wont mention multiple modules (also this might be a case where it
makes sense, es
On Mon, 5 Jan 2015 23:48:43 +0100, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
Am Mon, 05 Jan 2015 23:35:49 +0100
schrieb Gilles :
Which docs?
I didn't intend to move the "userguide" document; only the Java
examples currently under "src/userguide/java" would be moved to
"src/main"
I wont mention multiple modul
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 9:09 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 5 January 2015 at 07:03, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > there have been some fixes in the last few days (mostly thanks to sebb)
> and
> > my feeling is, that we're ready to cut 1.4.1 RC3.
>
> Yes, I think it is in a stable state.
> I h
On 6 January 2015 at 00:30, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 9:09 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 5 January 2015 at 07:03, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > there have been some fixes in the last few days (mostly thanks to sebb)
>> and
>> > my feeling is, that we're ready to cut
On 01/05/2015 11:58 PM, Gilles wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Jan 2015 23:48:43 +0100, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
>> Am Mon, 05 Jan 2015 23:35:49 +0100
>> schrieb Gilles :
>>
>>> Which docs?
>>> I didn't intend to move the "userguide" document; only the Java
>>> examples currently under "src/userguide/java" would
30 matches
Mail list logo
