Re: [VOTE] Move COMPRESS to git

2015-08-23 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
+1 22. aug. 2015 21.29 skrev "Stefan Bodewig" : > Hi all > > more thann half a year ago I promised to call for a vote for migrating > to git as soon as 1.10 has been released. Well that took longer than > expected :-) > > Anyway, here is the vote: > > +1 Move to git > -1 Stick with svn > > vote w

Re: [VOTE] Move COMPRESS to git

2015-08-23 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
+1 On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 9:29 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > Hi all > > more thann half a year ago I promised to call for a vote for migrating > to git as soon as 1.10 has been released. Well that took longer than > expected :-) > > Anyway, here is the vote: > > +1 Move to git > -1 Stick with svn

Re: [VOTE] Move COMPRESS to git

2015-08-23 Thread Siegfried Goeschl
+1 (Non-binding) Siegfried Goeschl > On 22 Aug 2015, at 21:29, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > Hi all > > more thann half a year ago I promised to call for a vote for migrating > to git as soon as 1.10 has been released. Well that took longer than > expected :-) > > Anyway, here is the vote: > >

Re: [VOTE] Move COMPRESS to git

2015-08-23 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 22/08/2015 21:29, Stefan Bodewig a écrit : > Hi all > > more thann half a year ago I promised to call for a vote for migrating > to git as soon as 1.10 has been released. Well that took longer than > expected :-) > > Anyway, here is the vote: > > +1 Move to git +1 Luc > -1 Stick with svn

Re: [VOTE] Move COMPRESS to git

2015-08-23 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 22/08/2015 21:29, Stefan Bodewig a écrit : > Hi all > > more thann half a year ago I promised to call for a vote for migrating > to git as soon as 1.10 has been released. Well that took longer than > expected :-) > > Anyway, here is the vote: > > +1 Move to git +1 Luc > -1 Stick with svn

Re: [math] chi-squared test default deg freedom should be n-2 not n-1?

2015-08-23 Thread Phil Steitz
On 8/22/15 6:04 PM, Andrew Schaumberg wrote: > Dear devs, > > Chi-squared test takes degrees of freedom to be one fewer than the sample > count. You mean one fewer than the number of categories (the common length of the expected and observed count arrays). > https://commons.apache.org/proper/commo

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons CSV 1.2-RC2

2015-08-23 Thread Oliver Heger
Build works fine with Java 1.6 and 1.8 on Windows 10. Artifacts look good. The uploaded site obviously does not contain the project reports, at least http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/commons-csv-1.2-RC2/site/project-reports.html gives a 404. However, I was able to build the site locally. I got s

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons CSV 1.2-RC2

2015-08-23 Thread Gary Gregory
Thank you Oliver, the black magic of Maven sometimes still eludes me but I can now see that Java 7 ran out of memory building the site. Rebuilding with Java 8 and... done. Gary On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Oliver Heger wrote: > Build works fine with Java 1.6 and 1.8 on Windows 10. Artifact

keep going

2015-08-23 Thread Torsten Curdt
I am thrilled to see all that BCEL activity lately, folks. Would love to see the release being pulled across the finish line. Thanks to everyone involved. Sorry I don't have the time to contribute. Just wanted to give credit where credit is due. Thanks! Torsten

Re: svn commit: r1697267 - in /commons/proper/bcel/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/bcel6: classfile/ generic/ verifier/structurals/

2015-08-23 Thread sebb
On 23 August 2015 at 23:19, wrote: > Author: dbrosius > Date: Sun Aug 23 22:19:04 2015 > New Revision: 1697267 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1697267 > Log: > remove the need for casting at the clone() call site -1 I was hoping to reduce the number of API changes to the minimum, so we can pote