Re: Proposed Contribution to Apache Commons,

Thanks, Dave. Instructions below look good enough to me for the VOTE. Will kick that off later today. Phil > On Oct 29, 2015, at 5:56 AM, Dave Brosius wrote: > > git clone g...@github.com:NormanShapiro/Naomi.git > git checkout gh-pages > > > if you like, I already

Re: Proposed Contribution to Apache Commons,

git clone g...@github.com:NormanShapiro/Naomi.git git checkout gh-pages if you like, I already have a fork on github of it, I can merge gh-pages into master, and delete the gh-pages branch, and then the repo will be obviously just a one branch project. On 10/28/2015 08:19 PM, Phil

Re: [Imaging] 1.0 Release Date?

I know we had talked about apis and versions but at this point it seems like any kind of release would be good. I am ok with major version changes to break BC. Gary On Oct 29, 2015 3:44 AM, "Benedikt Ritter" wrote: > Hi, > > the main problem blocking a release ATM is the

Re: [MATH] ComplexUtils pull request; some future proposals

Le 28/10/2015 17:33, Eric Barnhill a écrit : > Dear all, Hi Eric, > > Thanks for the feedback on ComplexUtils and I have submitted a pull request > with the edits. I have pulled this request into our git repository, with minor edits. The changes are mainly removing tabs and trailing blanks,

[VOTE] Accept Naomi

This is a VOTE to accept the code discussed in [1] and available for review using the git commands below. All are welcome to vote, votes from PMC members are binding. Assuming a positive vote, we will execute a software grant with the authors and use the code as the basis for a new Commons

Re: [VOTE] Accept Naomi

+1 On 10/29/2015 08:42 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: This is a VOTE to accept the code discussed in [1] and available for review using the git commands below. All are welcome to vote, votes from PMC members are binding. Assuming a positive vote, we will execute a software grant with the authors and

Re: [VFS] Jackrabbit

Hi, 2015-10-29 2:17 GMT+01:00 : > Hello, > > Unfortunatelly the whole webdav filesystem tests depend on that specific > version as it wraps the server as an endpoint. The setUp fails so the whole > test suite will get skipped. I havent been able to quickly fix when I

Re: [VFS] Jackrabbit

Hi again, The issue was discovered during some work I was doing for Groovy-VFS. In that situtation the webdav provider is consumed and it will fail to work if anything JackRabbit 2.0+ is used as a depedency. The webdav provider released with VFS 2.0 is depending on a static field

Re: [Imaging] 1.0 Release Date?

Hi, the main problem blocking a release ATM is the massive amount of findbugs and PMD violations. Lot's of them probably require breaking changes to the API, that's why we currently don't want to release it in the current state. I've come to the conclusion that this may not be the best way to

Re: Proposed Contribution to Apache Commons,

Overall agree with the feedback. I may have missed some emails in the thread, but did we get another email from Norman to provide us with a bit more information? Again I might have missed it. Apologies if so. Jean-Louis Le jeu 29 oct. 2015 06:34, Phil Steitz a écrit : >

Re: [MATH] ComplexUtils pull request; some future proposals

Hello. On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 20:24:56 +0100, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Le 28/10/2015 17:33, Eric Barnhill a écrit : Dear all, Hi Eric, Thanks for the feedback on ComplexUtils and I have submitted a pull request with the edits. I have pulled this request into our git repository, with minor

Re: [MATH] ComplexUtils pull request; some future proposals

On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 20:24:56 +0100, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Le 28/10/2015 17:33, Eric Barnhill a écrit : Dear all, Hi Eric, Thanks for the feedback on ComplexUtils and I have submitted a pull request with the edits. Unless I'm mistaken, there is no report on the project's bug-tracking