Apache Math
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 7:06 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Please select your top choice among the following suggested names
> for the new [math]-based TLP. All are welcome and encouraged to
> respond. This POLL will be open for 72 hours, at which time two
> tallies will be presented: o
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 8:24 AM, Gilles wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 06:20:14 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>
>> Unscientifically, but in the interest of keeping things moving, it
>> looks to me like just plain "math" is the winner. Any objections to
>> moving forward with this name?
>>
>> Phil
>
>
>
Apache Math.
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 12:30 AM, Otmar Ertl wrote:
> Apache Math
>
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 11:42 PM, Ole Ersoy wrote:
>> Apache Epsilon
>>
>>
>> On 02/01/2016 03:55 PM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
>>>
>>> Apache Epsilon
>>>
>>>
On Feb 1, 2016, at 12:06 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>
Apache Math
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 11:42 PM, Ole Ersoy wrote:
> Apache Epsilon
>
>
> On 02/01/2016 03:55 PM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
>>
>> Apache Epsilon
>>
>>
>>> On Feb 1, 2016, at 12:06 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>>
>>> Please select your top choice among the following suggested names
>>> for the n
Apache Epsilon
On 02/01/2016 03:55 PM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
Apache Epsilon
On Feb 1, 2016, at 12:06 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
Please select your top choice among the following suggested names
for the new [math]-based TLP. All are welcome and encouraged to
respond. This POLL will be open for
On Mon, 01 Feb 2016 15:05:57 +, James Carman wrote:
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 9:50 AM Gilles
wrote:
"Math" is (a bit?) overwhelming for a team of 5- people.
In "Commons" there was the rationale of accepting only "common"
algorithms (although that was fairly fuzzy as a limitation).
Not so w
Hi Gary,
that was fast - done (hoping this works after years without SVN)
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
- Ursprüngliche Mail -
Von: "Gary Gregory"
An: "Commons Developers List"
Gesendet: Montag, 1. Februar 2016 22:27:56
Betreff: Fwd: svn commit: r1728011 - in /commons/proper/email/trunk:
Apache Epsilon
> On Feb 1, 2016, at 12:06 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
> Please select your top choice among the following suggested names
> for the new [math]-based TLP. All are welcome and encouraged to
> respond. This POLL will be open for 72 hours, at which time two
> tallies will be presente
On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 10:06:40 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
Please select your top choice among the following suggested names
for the new [math]-based TLP. All are welcome and encouraged to
respond. This POLL will be open for 72 hours, at which time two
tallies will be presented: one among those who
It would be nice to edit the commit comment to note the switch of Java
requirement.
Gary
-- Forwarded message --
From:
Date: Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 1:25 PM
Subject: svn commit: r1728011 - in /commons/proper/email/trunk: ./
src/changes/ src/main/java/org/apache/commons/mail/
src/main
I would prefer Apache Epsilon or Apache Math.
-Evan
On 02/01/2016 12:06 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Please select your top choice among the following suggested names
> for the new [math]-based TLP. All are welcome and encouraged to
> respond. This POLL will be open for 72 hours, at which time two
Math
Bruno
From: Phil Steitz
To: Commons Developers List
Sent: Tuesday, 2 February 2016 6:06 AM
Subject: [math] [POLL] new TLP name
Please select your top choice among the following suggested names
for the new [math]-based TLP. All are welcome and encouraged to
respond. This PO
Le 01/02/2016 18:06, Phil Steitz a écrit :
> Please select your top choice among the following suggested names
> for the new [math]-based TLP. All are welcome and encouraged to
> respond. This POLL will be open for 72 hours, at which time two
> tallies will be presented: one among those who have
Apache Math
Gary
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Please select your top choice among the following suggested names
> for the new [math]-based TLP. All are welcome and encouraged to
> respond. This POLL will be open for 72 hours, at which time two
> tallies will be present
Phil Steitz writes:
>Please select your top choice among the following suggested names
>for the new [math]-based TLP. All are welcome and encouraged to
>respond. This POLL will be open for 72 hours, at which time two
>tallies will be presented: one among those who have volunteered for
>the new
Apache Math
Le 1/02/2016 18:06, Phil Steitz a écrit :
> Please select your top choice among the following suggested names
> for the new [math]-based TLP. All are welcome and encouraged to
> respond. This POLL will be open for 72 hours, at which time two
> tallies will be presented: one among th
Apache Math
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 12:06 PM Phil Steitz wrote:
> Please select your top choice among the following suggested names
> for the new [math]-based TLP. All are welcome and encouraged to
> respond. This POLL will be open for 72 hours, at which time two
> tallies will be presented: o
Please select your top choice among the following suggested names
for the new [math]-based TLP. All are welcome and encouraged to
respond. This POLL will be open for 72 hours, at which time two
tallies will be presented: one among those who have volunteered for
the new PMC and a second among all
On 2/1/16 7:49 AM, Gilles wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 06:49:02 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 2/1/16 6:24 AM, Gilles wrote:
>>> On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 06:20:14 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
Unscientifically, but in the interest of keeping things moving, it
looks to me like just plain "math" is t
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 9:50 AM Gilles wrote:
>
> "Math" is (a bit?) overwhelming for a team of 5- people.
>
> In "Commons" there was the rationale of accepting only "common"
> algorithms (although that was fairly fuzzy as a limitation).
> Not so with that overly general name.
> It's a library tha
On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 06:49:02 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 2/1/16 6:24 AM, Gilles wrote:
On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 06:20:14 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
Unscientifically, but in the interest of keeping things moving, it
looks to me like just plain "math" is the winner. Any objections
to
moving forward w
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> 2016-02-01 14:49 GMT+01:00 Phil Steitz :
> ...Bertrand Delacretaz proposed to use the Podling Name Search Jira project
> for this [1]. I think that is a good idea for documentation purposes...
Note that this is just to verify that the name
2016-02-01 14:49 GMT+01:00 Phil Steitz :
> On 2/1/16 6:24 AM, Gilles wrote:
> > On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 06:20:14 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
> >> Unscientifically, but in the interest of keeping things moving, it
> >> looks to me like just plain "math" is the winner. Any objections to
> >> moving forwar
On 2/1/16 6:24 AM, Gilles wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 06:20:14 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> Unscientifically, but in the interest of keeping things moving, it
>> looks to me like just plain "math" is the winner. Any objections to
>> moving forward with this name?
>>
>> Phil
>
> Proposals were not
On 2/1/16 6:27 AM, Gilles wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 06:22:30 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 1/24/16 1:54 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> Please respond to this thread if you are a Commons Committer
>>> interested in joining the PMC for the new TLP based on [math].
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Phil
>>>
>>
On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 06:22:30 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 1/24/16 1:54 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
Please respond to this thread if you are a Commons Committer
interested in joining the PMC for the new TLP based on [math].
Thanks!
Phil
Any other volunteers? I would like to move on to drafting the
On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 06:20:14 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
Unscientifically, but in the interest of keeping things moving, it
looks to me like just plain "math" is the winner. Any objections to
moving forward with this name?
Phil
Proposals were not all presented when people gave opinions.
A [VOTE]
On 1/24/16 1:54 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Please respond to this thread if you are a Commons Committer
> interested in joining the PMC for the new TLP based on [math].
>
> Thanks!
>
> Phil
>
Any other volunteers? I would like to move on to drafting the Board
resolution in the next couple of days.
Unscientifically, but in the interest of keeping things moving, it
looks to me like just plain "math" is the winner. Any objections to
moving forward with this name?
Phil
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache
29 matches
Mail list logo
