RE: [CRYPTO] Defining the public API; are its interfaces supposed to be implemented or just used?

> -Original Message- > From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 09:07 > To: Commons Developers List ; Dennis Hamilton > > Subject: Re: [CRYPTO] Defining the public API; are its interfaces > supposed to be implemented or just used? > > On 28 June 2016 at 16:52,

Re: [CRYPTO] Defining the public API; are its interfaces supposed to be implemented or just used?

On 28 June 2016 at 16:52, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > Sebb, although this discussion does not apply to the Commons Crypto API > structure, I want to clean one part up. > >> -Original Message- >> From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Monday, June 20, 2016 09:26 >> To: Commons Devel

RE: [CRYPTO] Defining the public API; are its interfaces supposed to be implemented or just used?

Sebb, although this discussion does not apply to the Commons Crypto API structure, I want to clean one part up. > -Original Message- > From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, June 20, 2016 09:26 > To: Commons Developers List ; Dennis Hamilton > > Subject: Re: [CRYPTO] Defini

Jenkins build is back to normal : Commons-CRYPTO-JDK1.8 » Apache Commons Crypto #54

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Jenkins build is back to normal : Commons-CRYPTO-JDK1.8 #54

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Build failed in Jenkins: Commons-CRYPTO-JDK1.8 » Apache Commons Crypto #53

See Changes: [sebb] Internal class; should not be public [sebb] CRYPTO-63 Add JNA binding -- [...truncated 78 lines...] [INFO] [INFO] --- animal-sniffer-m

Build failed in Jenkins: Commons-CRYPTO-JDK1.8 #53

See Changes: [sebb] Internal class; should not be public [sebb] CRYPTO-63 Add JNA binding -- [...truncated 131 lines...] Tests run: 8, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.071

[Fileupload] CVE security page and site distribution

Hello, I was trying to come up with a Victims-cve-db entry for CVE-2016-3092 and I noticed a few odd things (https://github.com/victims/victims-cve-db/pull/47 ): a) the original mail from Jochen did contain a link to a security page but Commons FileUpload does not have one: http://mail-archives.

Re: [DISCUSS] "Fraction" also in Commons Lang (Was: [VOTE] New component: Rational numbers)

On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 07:05:25 -0400, Matt Adereth wrote: Fraction in o.a.c.m. implements the FieldElement interface, which I can't imagine moving to Lang. IMO, this adds to having a standalone component that can cater for simple and advanced usage. [E.g. casual use would refer to "Fraction"

Re: [DISCUSS] "Fraction" also in Commons Lang (Was: [VOTE] New component: Rational numbers)

Fraction in o.a.c.m. implements the FieldElement interface, which I can't imagine moving to Lang. On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 6:31 AM, Gilles wrote: > On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 17:21:40 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Ralph Goers >> wrote: >> >> Your reading and mine are

Re: [CRYPTO]1.0.0 Release Plan

On 28 June 2016 at 07:03, Sun, Dapeng wrote: > Thank Sebb for your great work! > > About the Properties instance, I have some personal opinions. > > I think properties provide a flexible configuration mechanism. Config values > could be added and read/written without too much limitation, we also

Re: [2/2] commons-compress git commit: More java7 language features

Takk, Kristian! That is more than 600 lines of double try.. finally blocks trimmed to 300! :-) On 27 Jun 2016 9:04 a.m., wrote: > > More java7 language features > > > Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-compress/repo > Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-com

Re: [DISCUSS] "Fraction" also in Commons Lang (Was: [VOTE] New component: Rational numbers)

On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 17:21:40 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote: On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: Your reading and mine are a bit different. Stephen Colebourne wanted Fraction kept in Commons Lang as he felt users would find more value in it there because Commons Math is too speci