[ANNOUNCE] Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 released!

The Apache Commons community is pleased to announce the release of Apache Commons BCEL 6.0. The Byte Code Engineering Library (Apache Commons BCEL) is intended to give users a convenient way to analyze, create, and manipulate (binary) Java class files (those ending with .class). Classes are repres

Re: [ALL] JDK 9 Version String

Thank you, I subscribed and asked a question out of curiosity... Gary On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Paul Benedict wrote: > You can't comment on the tickets, but they do want your feedback on their > Verona message board: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/verona-dev > > Cheers,

Re: [ALL] JDK 9 Version String

I noticed that you can't make an account there, too, when I wanted to report a javac bug. Plus, it would have been too convenient of a location to report JDK9 bugs during development apparently. On 14 July 2016 at 13:08, Paul Benedict wrote: > You can't comment on the tickets, but they do want y

Re: [ALL] JDK 9 Version String

You can't comment on the tickets, but they do want your feedback on their Verona message board: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/verona-dev Cheers, Paul On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > Am I blind or can someone point out how to comment on a JEP? The JEP is >

Re: [ALL] JDK 9 Version String

Am I blind or can someone point out how to comment on a JEP? The JEP is linked to https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8061493 but how do you get an account on that? I recall hearing a preso on how the comments for Java were locked down for fear of too much feedback... or something. Gary On

[ALL] JDK 9 Version String

If this issue has been raised in the past, my apologies. I did a search for "Verona" in the mail archives here and didn't see any hit besides Oracle's own notification [1]. That was the only hit. In JDK 9, the version string is changing from 1.0.X to bigger numbers like 9.0.0 [2]. Code that has as

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC8

Congratulations! Chas > On Jul 14, 2016, at 12:42 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > > This vote passes (am I dreaming? ;-) The following votes were cast: > > Oliver Heger: +1 (binding) > Gary Gregory: +1 (binding) > Mark Roberts: +1 > Oliver Lamy: +1 (binding) > Jörg Schaible: +1 (binding) > Emmanu

RE: [CRYPTO]1.0.0 Release Plan

I don't know if the deployment method for the binaries (.jar, etc.) of these releases provides useful download statistics for the Commons project. If it does, differentiating by the native platforms for which there are native shared-libraries that need to also be on the runtime path (e.g., to wo

Jenkins build is back to normal : commons-net #11

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Build failed in Jenkins: commons-bcel #37

See Changes: [britter] Add dependency tags to pom snippet [britter] Remove trailing white spaces -- [...truncated 440 lines...] AUsrc/main/java/org/apache/bcel/generic/DLOAD.java AUsr

Build failed in Jenkins: commons-net #10

See Changes: [sebb] Overlong line -- [...truncated 512 lines...] Running org.apache.commons.net.ftp.parser.FTPConfigEntryParserTest Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.002

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC8

This vote passes (am I dreaming? ;-) The following votes were cast: Oliver Heger: +1 (binding) Gary Gregory: +1 (binding) Mark Roberts: +1 Oliver Lamy: +1 (binding) Jörg Schaible: +1 (binding) Emmanuel Bourg: +1 (binding) Benedikt Ritter: +1 (binding) Thank you for reviewing this RC and the one b